Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And then Daniels was ordered to pay Trump for those legal fees?
true, daniels had to pay lawyer fees to trump but only on her defamation suit against him. she won her initial lawsuit against trump when his post-cohen law team decided not to contest.
She'll lose money because she doesn't understand how defamation actually works in the court of law. "Sounds like" is not the same as "She is". It's not a definitive accusation, therefore no defaming occured. She has no case and will wind up owing her predatory lawyer for money.
true, daniels had to pay lawyer fees to trump but only on her defamation suit against him. she won her initial lawsuit against trump when his post-cohen law team decided not to contest.
She'll lose money because she doesn't understand how defamation actually works in the court of law. "Sounds like" is not the same as "She is". It's not a definitive accusation, ....
"[ Karen McDougal ] approached Donald Trump and threatened to ruin his career and humiliate his family if he doesn’t give [ her ] money."
this is part of the continuation of trump's pay-off money being illegal campaign contributions ( part of why michael cohen is sitting in jail ).
Remember Cohen's lawyer was Hillary's lawyer; the dummy plead guilty to non-crimes. . . .
Cohen testified that both the catch-and-kill and plain ol' payoffs to bimbos predated his employment, predated Trump's candidacy for any office. If those actions were normal operating procedure for Trump to protect his personal interests, it can't be argued they became special actions just to benefit his campaign.
Remember Cohen's lawyer was Hillary's lawyer; the dummy plead guilty to non-crimes. . . .
Cohen testified that both the catch-and-kill and plain ol' payoffs to bimbos predated his employment, predated Trump's candidacy for any office. If those actions were normal operating procedure for Trump to protect his personal interests, it can't be argued they became special actions just to benefit his campaign.
Yes, payments made to these women in the weeks before election day, obviously had nothing to do with the election. John Edwards got taken to trial on a whole lot less. Trump clearly broke the law.
Remember Cohen's lawyer was Hillary's lawyer; the dummy plead guilty to non-crimes. . . .
cohen is a lawyer himself. are you arguing he wasn't aware of the crimes he was admitting guilt to?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
