Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
More like, who in the hell is feeding this guy. If anyone regularly has to flush their toilet more than once per "sitting", get your ass to a doctor. And maybe start eating real food for a change.
(Sorry for all the puns lol...I swear they (mostly) weren't intentional)
I disagree.
No one's stopping you from "saving"...
But is it REALLY the job of a national legislature to determine how and when you should "save"?
Do you think that adding politics and wrong ideas is a "good solution"?
. . . . .
My pet peeve is the focus on "fuel efficiency" (CAFE) that banned the station wagon, yet spawned the bigger SUV gas guzzler. The regulations should have focused on passenger-miles per gallon, and thus permitted larger capacity vehicles.
(A single occupant 50 mpg vehicle is less efficient than a nine occupant 10 mpg vehicle. 50 passenger-miles / gallon versus 90 passenger-miles / gallon.)
. . . . .
Frankly, I think that all meddling by government should cease. But politicians love wealth and power, and there's nothing like regulating everyone else's life under glorious socialism.
It REALLY is the government`s job to regulate water usage when the Colorado river that supports 16 million jobs is running dry.
This issue could be resolved by data but no, everyone runs to their corners. If Trump says it, it must be wrong. Since anybody can say anything let me posit that flushing is no more than 10% of residential water usage.
Mr. Trump appears to be ignorant of water issues in our western states.....among other things.
Or wastewater treatment costs in all states. Where I live, we pay more for sewer treatment than we do for the water. But IDK if this is a federal issue. States and municipalities have water conservation laws and building codes all require low water use toilets. They work well and are preferred by consumers. No manufacturer is going to go back to one of those old toilets.
It is because the "water saver" toilets don't flush good.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
“people are flushing toilets 10 times, 15 times”
