Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He's just using the remedy afforded to him by the law !!! If the left can't change that law then any other law they pass is for naught !!!
And according to the sheriff, he claims he'll be screening those he deputizes, which is much better than just ignoring the law. I'm sure he doesn't want the potential liability of having deputized the next mass shooter.
The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.
This however all boils down to two facts that gun control proponents
have not been able to address:
(1) There is a direct relationship between restrictive gun control laws and increased crime. Almost all gun control laws have been statistically proven to be linked to increases in crime.
(2) Criminals by definition do not obey the law. Using a firearm to harm another is already illegal.
Proponents might want to spend more time thinking about the facts, and less time writing about feelings that won't fix the problem.
The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights reserved.
There are 22,000 gun laws already on the books. ALL of them are INFRINGEMENTS and all of them are unconstitutional. Yet corrupt, leftist, activist courts uphold them. That has to change and we need to repeal these laws. There will be civil disobedience in the U.S. over these tyrannical gun laws that only affect the law abiding.
The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.
This however all boils down to two facts that gun control proponents
have not been able to address:
(1) There is a direct relationship between restrictive gun control laws and increased crime. Almost all gun control laws have been statistically proven to be linked to increases in crime.
(2) Criminals by definition do not obey the law. Using a firearm to harm another is already illegal.
Proponents might want to spend more time thinking about the facts, and less time writing about feelings that won't fix the problem.
The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights reserved.
Go ahead lefties... Try and snatch our guns... The only way you will get them is out of our cold dead hands, and the lazy left is too lazy to dig that many body pits to hide the evidence. I thought the left was nuts before, but they are going to get the favor returned to them 10 fold if they ever forcefully try to disarm our citizens en mass.
They would have to do it county by county, and I have a feeling many rural communities will find creative ways to skirt the law, or even override it. This sheriff has a bright idea, and if it were to work, it would easily catch on in hundreds of counties across America. Bloomturd is an elitist, and he has no idea how people live in rural communities, and how committed they are to defying know it all elitist city dwellers. It's quite literally in their DNA.
There are 22,000 gun laws already on the books. ALL of them are INFRINGEMENTS and all of them are unconstitutional. Yet corrupt, leftist, activist courts uphold them. That has to change and we need to repeal these laws. There will be civil disobedience in the U.S. over these tyrannical gun laws that only affect the law abiding.
But law number 22,001 might work. Think of the children; the CHILDREN!!! LOL
But law number 22,001 might work. Think of the children; the CHILDREN!!! LOL
As you know it is not about reducing violence or murder. Democrat politicians and elitists like Bloomberg only want to disarm the law abiding. Yet they have heavily ARMED security details with them 24/7.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.