Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If they don't vote this week, it means they don't have the votes....
Yeah, most likely. But what I think they'll do. if they are at that point, is push the vote out to mid to late January, so they can "investigate and question further" and scramble to get more gossip type evidence to try to secure the votes.....
I wonder how many Democrats will vote against articles of impeachment, if they are drafted?
I heard 2 or 3, as of late this past week, with a few others considering voting against.
If they were truly wise-thinking elected officials, they would step back and realize this is a whole lot of accusations and not at all impeachable. The Democrats could act wisely and reasonably, and save their reelection chances in purple or red leaning districts.
6 as of the last count I have seen.
Here's a list of vulnerable Dems. The red is what I hear to be a NO vote - but assume nothing.
Tom O’Halleran (D-Ariz.)
Lucy McBath’s (D-Ga.)
Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.)
Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.)
Abby Finkenauer (D-Iowa)
Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa)
Cindy Axne’s (D-Iowa)
Jared Golden (D-Maine) Dan Kildee (D-Mich.)
Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.)
Haley Stevens (D-Mich.)
Angie Craig (D-Minn.) Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) Susie Lee’s (D-Nev.)
Chris Pappas’s (D-N.H.) Jefferson Van Drew (D-N.J.)
Andy Kim (D-N.J.)
Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.)
Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.)
Xochitl Torres Small (D-N.M.)
Max Rose (D-N.Y.)
Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.)
Antonio Delgado (D-N.Y.) Anthony Brindisi (D-N.Y.) Kendra Horn(D-Okla.)
Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.)
Conor Lamb (D-Pa.)
Joe Cunningham (D-S.C.)
Ben McAdams (D-Utah)
Elaine Luria’s (D-Va.)
Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.)
Ron Kind (D-Wis.)
Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, has demanded Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, delay Monday’s hearing after Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Foreign Affairs Committee and Budget Committee transmitted thousands of pages of documents to House Judiciary Republicans less than 48 hours before Judiciary’s hearing scheduled to examine impeachment presentations from Intelligence and Judiciary Committees.
The document release comes 25 days after Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee wrote to Chairman Nadler requesting all documents related to the impeachment investigation according to House Rule XI, 2(e)2(a). Republicans received no response from the chairman.
“Chairman Nadler has no choice but to postpone Monday’s hearing in the wake of a last-minute document transmission that shows just how far Democrats have gone to pervert basic fairness. Nearly a month after every Republican on our committee asserted our clear right to see all underlying documents held by the committees involved in the impeachment investigation, we have received no response from the chairman. Instead, Democrats waited until after Speaker Pelosi announced that articles of impeachment were imminent and chose the eve of the Judiciary Committee’s impeachment hearing to share loads of documents that Chairman Schiff has had since this investigation began. It is impossible for Judiciary members to sift through thousands and thousands of pages in any meaningful way in a matter of hours,” said Collins.
“Moreover, Democrats still refuse to release all documentation in their possession, though Republicans have demanded this according to rules of the House — which Democrats themselves adopted in January. The information Democrats released today is partial, biased and curated to support accusations that have, to date, been thinner than cotton candy.
1. Obstruction of justice.
2. Contempt of Congress.
3. Abuse of power.
4. Impairing the administration of justice.
5. Acceptance of emoluments.
6. Corruption of elections.
7. Abuse of pardons.
8. Conduct grossly incompatible with the presidency.
Contact your Senators and request that if articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate that your Senators act as Americans and not in fear of reprisal.
1. Obstruction of justice.
2. Contempt of Congress.
3. Abuse of power.
4. Impairing the administration of justice.
5. Acceptance of emoluments.
6. Corruption of elections.
7. Abuse of pardons.
8. Conduct grossly incompatible with the presidency.
Contact your Senators and request that if articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate that your Senators act as Americans and not in fear of reprisal.
1. Obstruction of justice.
2. Contempt of Congress.
3. Abuse of power.
4. Impairing the administration of justice.
5. Acceptance of emoluments.
6. Corruption of elections.
7. Abuse of pardons.
8. Conduct grossly incompatible with the presidency.
Contact your Senators and request that if articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate that your Senators act as Americans and not in fear of reprisal.
It was Mr. Green, in the conservatory, with the lead pipe.
This time we'll get him.
The objective is to impeach the voters !!!
Democrats are indicating they have to like our choice/votes or they will nullify it !!!
They are promoting one party rule like other communist models of gov.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Charges That Trump Could Face
