Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:20 PM
 
25,420 posts, read 9,735,287 times
Reputation: 15247

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
This is huge.

Bad news for the people downplaying the IG report.


Statement from US Attorney Durham

“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
Of course. I expect nothing less from Durham. Gotta spin a nothing burger any way you can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:21 PM
 
25,420 posts, read 9,735,287 times
Reputation: 15247
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
Who has told you it's a fraud?
Did you read it? What was found? Nothing of substance. Trying to find something out of nothing in order to make Trump happy has got to be exhausting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:22 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,479,823 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
So let us know when we have some concrete information from Durham rather than your rank speculation about what he might have to say. Meanwhile, the much-anticipated IG report appears to be a dud for conspiracy theorists.
Durham:

US attorney leading Russia probe: "We do not agree with some of the report's conclusions"

US Attorney John Durham — who is leading Attorney General William Barr's probe of the origins of the Russia investigation — says his investigation is broader. Durham reports to Barr.

"We advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened," he said in a statement.

Here's the statement from Durham: “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:23 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,563,902 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Durham:

US attorney leading Russia probe: "We do not agree with some of the report's conclusions"

US Attorney John Durham — who is leading Attorney General William Barr's probe of the origins of the Russia investigation — says his investigation is broader. Durham reports to Barr.

"We advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened," he said in a statement.

Here's the statement from Durham:“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
That statement offers no specifics. Wake me up when you have something other than speculation about what Durham might have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:25 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,479,823 times
Reputation: 10096
Durham:

US attorney leading Russia probe: "We do not agree with some of the report's conclusions"

US Attorney John Durham — who is leading Attorney General William Barr's probe of the origins of the Russia investigation — says his investigation is broader. Durham reports to Barr.

"We advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened," he said in a statement.

Here's the statement from Durham: “I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:26 PM
 
25,420 posts, read 9,735,287 times
Reputation: 15247
Lord have mercy. What will it be after Durham's report doesn't show anything criminal? I guess we'll just have to wait to see what the title of the next "Oh my God, just wait until you see this" thread will be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,831 posts, read 17,028,856 times
Reputation: 11532
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
That statement offers no specifics. Wake me up when you have something other than speculation about what Durham might have.
They don't agree and that does not tell you anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:27 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,563,902 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
They don't agree and that does not tell you anything?
It tells me that he does not agree. The substance and degree of that disagreement is a total unknown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:28 PM
 
25,420 posts, read 9,735,287 times
Reputation: 15247
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
They don't agree and that does not tell you anything?
And what does Durham's disagreement with Horowitz tell you at this point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2019, 12:28 PM
 
7,264 posts, read 4,187,458 times
Reputation: 5464
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Did you read it? What was found? Nothing of substance. Trying to find something out of nothing in order to make Trump happy has got to be exhausting.

Did you read it? Who told you it's a fraud?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top