Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:28 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,417,724 times
Reputation: 6408

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
You guys think Russian troll farmers on social media spending $50,000 on FaceBook ads, and $4,700 on all Google platforms, actually had a measurable impact on the election. So much so, that some of you guys claim the Russians "hacked" the election.

It's a joke that $55,000 spent by russians affected the election. This is just what Hilary spent by August 2016.

According to NBC News, as of August 2016, Hillary Clinton’s campaign has spent $61 million on general election campaign ads. In addition, pro-Clinton groups have spent $43 million, bringing the total amount spent on Clinton ads to $104 million.
So "you guys" think Director Wray" is the Deep State now too, right? Trump lied again. Time to face reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,547 posts, read 18,143,148 times
Reputation: 15524
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
We are witnessing the most disgraceful behavior from trump and the GOP that I ever have seen from elected officials in my lifetime!

Those of you who believe what they are telling you; they are taking you for non-critical thinking fools who are unable to discern facts from brazen lies.
Still covering for Biden and his Quid Pro Quo using Trump as the shiny object to take away the corruption of the Biden's.. it will not work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,547 posts, read 18,143,148 times
Reputation: 15524
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
So "you guys" think Director Wray" is the Deep State now too, right? Trump lied again. Time to face reality.
Of Course.. they protect their own skins.. Rosenstein is dirty as well. They all are ..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,134,270 times
Reputation: 13793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
The fox is guarding the hen house internal security inspection is no inspection
The fox will certainly do his best not to embarrass, or bring shame to the hen house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Perfect title this morning.

Another Inquiry Doesn’t Back Up Trump’s Charges. So, on to the Next.

By the time the Justice Department inspector general’s report was released, the president and his supporters had moved on in their effort to convince Americans of the enemies arrayed against him.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/09/u...gtype=Homepage
That article starts out on a false premise. They start out saying the report on the origins of the accusations against Trump fall short. They then mention the IG report. the IG report was about what the FBI may have done wrong. The origins of the accusations are outside the IG's realm. The Durham investigation is the only one looking into the origin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,547 posts, read 18,143,148 times
Reputation: 15524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
So you read the report and you're now spewing opinion. It clearly states the dossier wasn't necessary for the warrant but you wont accept that fact.


They did write down their bias, that was clearly stated in the report regarding the text messages.


Did you read the report?
Their bias changed the facts and deleted others to obtain the FISA WARRANT.. it is in the report.. very bias.. the so called mistakes.. 17 of them all leaning for the FISA and against anyone near Trump.. changed many facts.. it was not by accident. It was by bias.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:34 AM
 
952 posts, read 323,491 times
Reputation: 213
So what was this " crucial " factor that was " key" to opening the investigation .
The report says what was not " crucial " in opening the investigation .
And it alludes to there being a "crucial" fact to opening the investigation , but as far as I have read I cannot readily identify this most " crucial " fact that prompted the investigation ?
Anyone ?
Just askin ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:37 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,417,724 times
Reputation: 6408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
That article starts out on a false premise. They start out saying the report on the origins of the accusations against Trump fall short. They then mention the IG report. the IG report was about what the FBI may have done wrong. The origins of the accusations are outside the IG's realm. The Durham investigation is the only one looking into the origin.
Wray makes it pretty clear. Do not follow along with Trump's lies.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-...ry?id=67605418
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by KayAnn246 View Post
Wray makes it pretty clear. Do not follow along with Trump's lies.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-...ry?id=67605418
Notice that he did not say Russia. The origins of this whole mess were with the Steele Dossier, paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton Campaign. His tweet is meaningless as far as your reply is concerned. Nice try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 09:44 AM
 
952 posts, read 323,491 times
Reputation: 213
So what was this " crucial " factor that was " key" to opening the investigation .
The report says what was not " crucial " in opening the investigation .
And it alludes to there being a "crucial" fact to opening the investigation , but as far as I have read I cannot readily identify this most " crucial " fact that prompted the investigation ?
Anyone ?
Just askin ?
Anybody?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top