Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You attack me because you know that it's the truth and can't fight the fact.....
I didn't attack you. I just said you speak as if you know what was what. And that you should share that information with Horowitz. Because he seemed to have left that part out.
Page was a CIA informant. After trying to get a FISA on Papadopolous and failing, they went off what Poppy said in a wiretap, that the Russians would be willing to help "us" Carter Page was the only person that ever had contact with Russia. The FBI assumed the bogus Downer tip, was about Carter Page.
The insurance policy was to lie to the court and alter documents, in McCabes Office meeting. In comes the Steel Dossier. Remember the date August 15th, 2016. A lot was going on that day.
I'll repeat myself: Page didn't work for Trump in 2014. Period.
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,999 posts, read 4,121,056 times
Reputation: 2677
Another big question in my mind after the report yesterday...... Who's in charge of the FISA court? If I've learned correctly, it's SC Justice Roberts? Is that correct? So the guy in charge of a court that got duped will now be a part of the Senate trial for impeachment... Sticky Situation???
Another big question in my mind after the report yesterday...... Who's in charge of the FISA court? If I've learned correctly, it's SC Justice Roberts? Is that correct? So the guy in charge of a court that got duped will now be a part of the Senate trial for impeachment... Sticky Situation???
No, not correct.
All of the Federal judges that sit on the FISC currently have been appointed by Justice Roberts, but he isn't "in charge" of the FISC. The presiding judge is currently Rosemary Collyer.
When the court was founded, it was composed of seven federal district judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States, each serving a seven-year term, with one judge being appointed each year. In 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act expanded the court from seven to eleven judges, and required that at least three of the Court's judges live within twenty miles (32 km) of the District of Columbia. No judge may be appointed to this court more than once, and no judge may be appointed to both the Court of Review and the FISA court.
Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed all of the current judges.
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,999 posts, read 4,121,056 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan
No, not correct.
All of the Federal judges that sit on the FISC currently have been appointed by Justice Roberts, but he isn't "in charge" of the FISC. The presiding judge is currently Rosemary Collyer.
When the court was founded, it was composed of seven federal district judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States, each serving a seven-year term, with one judge being appointed each year. In 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act expanded the court from seven to eleven judges, and required that at least three of the Court's judges live within twenty miles (32 km) of the District of Columbia. No judge may be appointed to this court more than once, and no judge may be appointed to both the Court of Review and the FISA court.
Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed all of the current judges.
So hypothetically.... we are having a hearing in the Senate about impeachment. All this FISA abuse starts coming to light and the presiding judge appointed all the judges who were duped doesn't that in fact make him a witness to the procedures?
Very good article on how the IG reports frames topics to avoid going into the area of intentions by the FBI and writes it all off as poor procedures and policies
Steele report provided the FBI/CIA with fake intel they could launder and Steele in turn used third-parties so he didn't have to answer directly to the credibility or the source of the information.
This is a report on how badly they mangled the investigation because the FBI agent forgot to check that one of their targets was a government informant.
So hypothetically.... we are having a hearing in the Senate about impeachment. All this FISA abuse starts coming to light and the presiding judge appointed all the judges who were duped doesn't that in fact make him a witness to the procedures?
I don't see why. There is no malfeasance by the judges being alleged, only by the creators of the data/reports/applications/whatever that was presented to the judges.
Very good article on how the IG reports frames topics to avoid going into the area of intentions by the FBI and writes it all off as poor procedures and policies
Wow - Rolling Stone magazine article. Pillars of the MSM citadel starting to crumble when the truth comes out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.