Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
(Sec.). 1013. (a) TRANSMITTAL OF SPECIAL MESSAGE.—Whenever the
President, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the
head of any department or agency of the United States, or any officer
or employee of the United States proposes to defer any budget authority provided for a specific purpose or project, the President shall
transmit to the House of Representatives and the Senate a special message specifying—
(1) the amount of the budget authority proposed to be
deferred;
(2) any account, department, or establishment of the Government to which such budget authority is available for obligation,
and the specific projects or governmental functions involved;
(3) the period of time during which the budget authority is
proposed to be deferred;
(4) the reasons for the proposed deferral, including any legal
authority invoked by him to justify the proposed deferral;
(5) to the maximum extent practicable, the estimated fiscal,
economic, and budgetary effect of the proposed deferral; and
(6) all facts, circumstances, and considerations relating to or
bearing upon the proposed deferral and the decision to effect the
proposed deferral, including an analysis of such facts, circumstances, and considerations in terms of their application to any
legal authority and specific elements of legal authority invoked
by him to justify such proposed deferral, and to the maximum
extent practicable, the estimated effect of the proposed deferral
upon the objects, purposes, and programs for which the budget
authority is provided.
You simply don't know what you are talking about and I'm embarrassed for you. Educate yourself and we can continue this conversation.
I'll give you a hint though, if House Democrats truly believed as they've convinced you to, they'd have taken it to court and won. They knew they'd lose, so they didn't go that route....they just assumed that their base was ignorant enough to not know the truth and simply believe whatever they tell them to believe.
Blanket executive privilege doesn’t exist. Simply making specious arguments without any basis to be used as excuses for ignoring lawful subpoenas and demanding that they be challenged in court through all level of appeals would, in effect, deprive Congress of its power to impeach by letting the a president conceal all relevant evidence and then run out the clock while arguing lack of evidence. Functionally, it is an obstruction of Congress.
The GOP has no defense for the president when they have to resort to totally off topic things such as ^^^ that. Unfortunately, trump's base cannot discern what is relevant and what is not.
Blanket executive privilege doesn’t exist. Simply making specious arguments without any basis to be used as excuses for ignoring lawful subpoenas and demanding that they be challenged in court through all level of appeals would, in effect, deprive Congress of its power to impeach by letting the a president conceal all relevant evidence and then run out the clock while arguing lack of evidence. Functionally, it is an obstruction of Congress.
Doubling down on ignorance doesn't make for a valid arguement. The House Democrats know better than you, that's why they didn't even challenge Trump's claim of executive privilege.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.