Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We got Trump, wait till Comey's testimony - FAIL!
No, seriously, we got him this time with Mueller Report - FAIL!
No we're REALLY REALLY serious this time and got him with Russia Russia Russia - FAIL!
Ok, we're REALLY REALLY REALLY serious with Ukraine Ukraine - FAIL!
Ok, let's see.... we'll just vote to impeach with no evidence to show the crimes were done by the President but only shown the Dems were the ones that are guilty of those crimes and since we have majority in the House to get the votes, lets impeach- FAIL!
There is no way to take these loony Left seriously and they are only wasting tax payers money and time by only focusing on trying to impeach and remove Trump at all cost. FAIL!
Based on the transcript, no crimes, no evidence of crimes. Hearsay, third party, gossip and accusations are the foundation of the impeachment. Add Democrat rage and hate for Trump, and the recipe for their wreckless action is impeachment.
All US Presidents have had to do things that Schiff & Nadler would've clutched their pearls at and screamed "impeach!" But thank God those idiots are not in charge.
This whole thing was a situation Democrats were on the edge of their seats watching Trump like a hawk, in order to "get him" on anything.
It's a political sham fueled by hate and rage.
The Democrat's error here is assuming the American public buys their BS and "sad/solemn" reasoning for impeaching.
The somewhat fascinating thing here is that the Democrat's rage with impeachment, will most likely help Trump's re-election in 2020.
So for the record you see no problem with a sitting president asking a foreign leader to investigate and announce investigations of domestic political rivals correct? This is an indisputable fact at this point.
Note how the Republican continue to attack the process, not the actual charges. The reason there wasn't more of a trial is precisely why he was impeached for obstruction of justice. There was still enough information to successfully impeach DJT.
Heh, you're funny. I hope Nancy pockets this impeachment until the Democrats get control of the Senate. To my knowledge there's no expiration date.
the Republicans have consistently said there was no crime. The Republicans have pointed to Turley's testimony, where he said "going to the courts is not obstruction".
And I could be wrong, but I don't see the Dems gaining ~20 Senate seats of 33 up for vote in 2020. Most of them are in the South and "flyover country" that was consistently red in 2016. Maybe you'll compare the states to any of the 2016 election map and tell us differently.
the Republicans have consistently said there was no crime. The Republicans have pointed to Turley's testimony, where he said "going to the courts is not obstruction".
To what Court did Trump go to seek an injunction blocking the subpoenas?
GTFOH. You are a partisan. One rule for Democrats, different rule for the GOP.
I don't understand your question. Second, I gave examples of looking at Democrats and Republicans. What I think you're missing isn't based on Democrats or Republicans, it's literally based on past tense or future tense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
