Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are implying they did not like him because he was a Republican, that was not the reason, his party did not matter, many people did not like him personally, yet he still almost won. This was not some "anti-Republican blow back" like you are implying. Just as Hillary losing was not some anti-Democrat blow back, fact is many people did not like her personally regardless of her politics.
Excuses are like as....well you know where I was going with that.
Physical signs would include damage to the hymen. Physical signs are not found in 90% of abused children.
So him claiming that the child wasn't raped because her hymen was intact is not scientifically sound.
No, that doesn't follow. Most "abuse" isn't rape. You have told us nothing relevant to your conclusion that "claiming that the child wasn't raped because her hymen was intact is not scientifically sound". You might be right, but you didn't make your case.
Last edited by hbdwihdh378y9; 12-21-2019 at 02:57 PM..
No, that doesn't follow. Most "abuse" isn't rape. You have told us nothing relevant to your conclusion that "claiming that the child wasn't raped because her hymen was intact is not scientifically sound".
Excuses are like as....well you know where I was going with that.
Not really an excuse, just a fact. Facts are what drives things, and no Democrat in their right mind is going to think this was some pro Democrat surge, versus what is was, a disliked guy who is a Republican, disliked for who he is, not because of his party.
lol It's about rape and not what you posted. This was about vaginal penetration and when an adult does that to a child, the hymen breaks. Why else would Bevin make it about that?
There was no physical evidence to support the rape.
Not really an excuse, just a fact. Facts are what drives things, and no Democrat in their right mind is going to think this was some pro Democrat surge, versus what is was, a disliked guy who is a Republican, disliked for who he is, not because of his party.
He lost. He was a Republican. Let’s not be disputatious over those 2 most important facts.
Miss me with all the right wing prevaricating.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
