Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2019, 07:45 PM
 
22,661 posts, read 24,599,374 times
Reputation: 20339

Advertisements

Well a very Blue city...........Blue is trending hard left. NYC has been that way for, UMM, how long???

And yeah, Dems love the dynamic of a city, mainly filled with their super-rich, nobly ruling over
their very poor serfs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2019, 07:57 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,674,856 times
Reputation: 14050
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKO View Post
Simplified:

People in cities have to accept they have to work together with people that are very different from themselves and that is what the democrats represent. Tolerance and working together.

Rural and semi-rural people have little enough, directly, to do with other people for their everyday survival so feel like they're going it alone and so should others.
The key word there is "they feel like"....since virtually everything and every service they use in their daily lives was likely provided by or created by or invented by someone in a city......

But if they wear a cowboy hat and boots and drive a Pickup and listen to country music and right wing radio they are convinced they could survive without modern civilization. They can't.

If any of them....many here I am sure....just kept a daily journal for a week of everything they used, bought, consumed, etc.....they would be amazed at the tiny percentage which "they built".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 08:11 PM
 
Location: East Chicago, IN
3,100 posts, read 3,302,170 times
Reputation: 1697
Basically every large city in every state is pretty liberal because those are the places where you can not be one homogenous group and thrive. You kinda have to deal with other groups or go back to where you came from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 08:16 PM
 
3,618 posts, read 3,055,372 times
Reputation: 2788
I haven't read all the threads here but most in NYC still support public works. Subways, libraries, schools, roads, sewers, street lights, etc. That kind of makes them a bunch of socialists in the eyes of small town, midwest USA, but it's really just survival and taking care of their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Manchester NH
15,507 posts, read 6,432,565 times
Reputation: 4831
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKO View Post
It's not perfection or true 100% of the time. Nothing ever is and demanding it leads to certain disappointment. Cities by necessity foster circumstances where people of very different views, races, religions etc. have to get along and work together more often than happens in rural areas. Is it in every aspect of life all the time, of course not, but it is a different kinds of people working together in a way you can't get in rural areas because the people there aren't so different from one another. It's kinda seems obvious to me.

By tolerant I mean not accusing those who aren't like you of being perverts, infidels, enemy of the US, etc....
fair enough.

I think they are more tolerant, just not as unified as a smaller community.

Evidently besides racial/ethnic diversity, having a unified community leads to cultural assimilation over time.

The reason NYC has so many different cultures and traditions is because of how separated and segregated the city is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Manchester NH
15,507 posts, read 6,432,565 times
Reputation: 4831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussiehoff View Post
Right, like some kind of new world order with global governance? Is someone or some group organising this "International finance"?
Yeah.

There are certainly ethnic groups that are more invested in international monetary structures and big banking systems than others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Various
9,049 posts, read 3,523,517 times
Reputation: 5470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
Yeah.

There are certainly ethnic groups that are more invested in international monetary structures and big banking systems than others.
The Jews right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 09:40 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,947,840 times
Reputation: 11660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post

New York is made up of financial bundlers, advertisment executives, mass media employees, global bankers, tech start-ups, and other high expense ambitious workers looking to make a buck.


No one here has yet explained: how can NYC be considered a left wing / anti-capitalist metropolis when all its people, social division (massive racial segregation), wealth disparity, corporate capital, investment capital, globalized economy, wealthy entrepreneurs are literal shrines to capitalism.

They are the private monopoly and monetary powers republicans praise as 'job-creators'. I hate all of them but why do republicans lie and call it 'left wing'?
California is also similar to NYC. Hollywood, Aerospace, Silicon Valley, Venture Capitalists, BioTech in SD, the military industrial complex all have footprints in CA. Those are all corps.

But CA is uber Dem/Blue. Massive wealth disparity exists there. Many Illegals live there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
No, think harder.

Why was he wall street's favorite candidate? TARP, the bailouts, cutting the deficit, welfare reform, aggressive foriegn policy, religious support of Israel and Saudi Arabia, etc.

I get Fox News says one thing but he was a die in the wool conservative imperialist.
As a politician, Obama visited Wall Street banks a lot during his term. He needed their support. And it was Republicans like Dubya (GW Bush) that started the Bailouts. I believe Obama did his own version of bailouts. Both sides are in the pocket of the one apparently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
It is very easy to explain. American liberal leftism is mostly about superficial social fluff, otherwise it is very careful not to interrupt the bottom to top wealth flows. Thus one can seat on two chairs - wealth appropriation and feel good concern about the world and the people (you do not want to be around). It costs almost nothing yet, if one has certain mindset, he feels much better about himself and his contributions to humanity.
One seat on two chairs is essentially a deep state. Everyone thinks there is two powers out there, but are unaware of the single power behind them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
Welfare is only one small policy.

If New York had anti-capitalist policies, why would so many multinational corporations, business investors, and bankers play ball in that town?

The fact is handouts don't compensate for corporate rule over society and banking authorization of consumer habits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastriver View Post
Because they attract people who want to live in that kind of leftist progressive atmosphere.

Remember that Chase is shutting down right wing bank accounts. They are taking sides in the gun control debate. They are celebrating diversity.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...omments-815840

"Two weeks after Chase Bank announced that it would no longer do business with Proud Boys Chairman Enrique Tarrio, Conservative performance artist and Rebel Media personality Martina Markota has become the latest conservative media figure to be targeted by the bank which has made no secret of its support for liberal causes (see its decision to cut ties with the gun industry)."
https://www.infowars.com/chase-bank-...rtina-markota/
Chase has to know supporting the left is not in their best interest business wise unless they are controlled opposition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 09:55 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,947,840 times
Reputation: 11660
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim View Post
Normally where you'll find large pools of uneducated, impoverished, malnourished, crime ridden neighborhoods with huge wealth gaps between the rich and the poor...you'll find that they are largely democrat.

Simply put, these large pools tend to be EXTREMELY generous with give ways and handouts, NYC being the King of these types of cities.

You can literally be a bum, do-nothing in NYC and be entitled to free housing, food, healthcare, transportation and education. NYC politicians (take De Blasio for example) are money-pit politicians who are your traditional tax and spend communist liberals.
You mean like California, Chicago and NYC? All those places have big big businesses, and lots of wealthy people too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post
Most Democratically controlled urban areas are leftist, and they keep re-electing the same failures to run the city. NYC was a mess until Rudy cleaned it up (many of my left leaning relatives loved and voted for Rudy).

As to the underfunded Harlem schools, many a liberal hypocrite will say one thing and do another. When De Blasio decided to integrate certain special charter type schools, liberal parents were apoplectic and sounded like people you would expect to hear in the old south of the 1960's.
They had their special carve out, and didn't want "inferior kids" being integrated in under the plan.


`
Rudy was Red/Repub by the time he became Mayor of NYC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
Corporations like social policies that homogenize a population into the global community and promote equality; they want massive population that can be mobilized for the economic needs of the global monetary system which requires a rootless cosmopolitan make-up, even if that means sacrificing some profit.

But that doesn't answer the financial side of the equation, if their economic power and wealth were being dominated by small folk and small businesses, why would they stay? Answer: because NYC policy promotes private equity and realestate speculators who control the working population.
But then what role does the left play for them then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 11:14 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,947,840 times
Reputation: 11660
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
You are so wrong, TKO.

NYC is the 4th most segregated city in the country. NYC schools are the most segregated schools in the country.

rural people live, work, worship, and attend school with their neighbors. they aren't segregated from others. they experience the problems with increased crime and crowded schools due to illegal immigration. these problems are not academic to them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
This is completely wrong; places with limited resources require collaboration to survive.

The city economy is based on personal ambition and networking.

I agree on tolerance of other races, but that doesn't mean friendship; NYC is the most segregated place in America.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKO View Post
It's not perfection or true 100% of the time. Nothing ever is and demanding it leads to certain disappointment. Cities by necessity foster circumstances where people of very different views, races, religions etc. have to get along and work together more often than happens in rural areas. Is it in every aspect of life all the time, of course not, but it is a different kinds of people working together in a way you can't get in rural areas because the people there aren't so different from one another. It's kinda seems obvious to me.

By tolerant I mean not accusing those who aren't like you of being perverts, infidels, enemy of the US, etc....
The economics of NYC is more segregated too. Unless you get to white collar work. Blue collar employment is very segregated.

NYC is strange in that there is a lot of segregation, but also a lot of diversity. There exists multiple various groups with their own section of RE, and employment. For example, the labor pool for 7 Eleven, and Subway Franchises is a homogenous group of South Asian origin. I never see Black, Hispanic, east asian, white working in any of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top