Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2019, 07:33 PM
 
Location: Hoosierville
17,331 posts, read 14,606,875 times
Reputation: 11569

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
I guess you would have to tell that to the landlords that take Section 8 vouchers.
In some municipalities, landlords do not have a choice - they cannot discriminate and must participate in the Section 8 program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2019, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Evergreen, Colorado
1,260 posts, read 1,101,799 times
Reputation: 1943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Ah, so you gave it away. You're a disrespectful millennial who resorts to an insult when you can't refute an argument. The fact is that there are MILLIONS of people who were born poor and who today are comfortably middle and upper-middle class. This so-called "system" didn't keep them poor.

Maybe when you grow up a bit, you'll see that many people stayed poor because they made bad decisions, while their neighbors and classmates moved up the economic ladder because they made good ones.
Being mistaken for a millennial made my day. I do hit the gym a lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,333,718 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity View Post
In some municipalities, landlords do not have a choice - they cannot discriminate and must participate in the Section 8 program.
Interesting. Where?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Hoosierville
17,331 posts, read 14,606,875 times
Reputation: 11569
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Interesting. Where?
Cook County Illinois for one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 08:30 PM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
6,926 posts, read 6,931,152 times
Reputation: 16509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Our "system" doesn't keep them poor. My parents were both born poor and each graduated from college, and my dad from grad school. They were smart, hard-working, motivated, and took advantage of academic scholarships.

The poor can do the same. At the minimum, they can take advantage of Pell Grants (not based on academic merit, so ANY poor person can get them) to get a free ride through a 2-year community college program, and end with an A.A. Assuming they picked a marketable field, that is enough to move them from poverty to, at a minimum, the lower-middle class.


P.S. But you didn't explain why the poor deserve to live higher lifestyles than the middle class.
In what years did your parents graduate from college? Going by your user name, you were born in 1976 which would mean that your folks got their diplomas in the early 70's or even the late 60's. The United States was like a whole other country back then. We had a global advantage because many of the world's nations had only recently rebuilt their infrastructures that were destroyed by WWII. In addition, Americans with only a high school diploma could still get good paying manufacturing jobs and the unions would cover their health insurance and pensions. Life was good in the sixties and early seventies. Tuition costs at state universities were fairly low. Students didn't have to take on the crushing load of debt that they do now.

I have no idea why you would call a Pell Grant a "free ride." According to Debt.org, approximately 7.6 million students used Pell Grants in 2016-2017. Those who received the maximum grant of $5,815 were able to cover 60% of the costs for tuition and fees at public four-year colleges. But this maximum grant represented only 29% of the average cost of tuition, fees, room and board at a state school. Plus, the vast majority of students do not get this maximum amount.

I very much doubt that your parents would have such an easy time of it in 2019/2020. Situations change. If you are an educated person like your parents are, you would understand this.

And a housing voucher does NOT give the poor a higher standard of living than the middle class. That was just yet another of LC's lies that he posts on this forum time after time ad nauseum (please see post #35 in this thread). But people - especially the republicans here are too lazy to fact check - especially when some falsehood helps to demonize the poor or those with the wrong skin color.

Last edited by Colorado Rambler; 12-28-2019 at 08:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,660 posts, read 21,025,987 times
Reputation: 14227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Red Road View Post
Pell Grants are not unlimited ...so NO, every person cannot get them.

In Merica, lower middle class - is still poor.

And yes - our system keeps people poor. I know it’s ugly, but you have to honest.
Agreed - many schools in poor neighborhoods do not have good teachers or provide the education that promotes wanting to get better. A few fight through - but it’s not easy. Problem is people who make opinions to the contrary never lived that life or it was 70 yrs ago when their parents were poor -and drugs, gangs and violence was not a daily problem. Hate to say it but there are different kinds of poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Florida
9,569 posts, read 5,616,686 times
Reputation: 12024
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastriver View Post
Add WIC, SNAP, school meals. Then they call the recipients "poor."
The Federal Minimum wage of $7.25 per hour hasn't been raised in a decade since July 2009.
If you want people off of these programs pay them a living wage instead.
It's quite simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,660 posts, read 21,025,987 times
Reputation: 14227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
Under no circumstances should Section 8 vouchers be used for houses when there are 100 million self-supporting Americans living in apartments because they can't afford a house. Why should those on the government dole get to live a HIGHER lifestyle than people who support themselves?
As if they giving hud vouchers like candy on Halloween ? It’s hard to get a voucher and it’s a very long wait - not to mention the requirements to get help. People are just that poor or disabled etc. That get help.!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,137 posts, read 3,858,763 times
Reputation: 4899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
Phoenix is a ghost town? Denver is a failed community?
Denver might economically be doing well on paper, but the violent crime and homicides have skyrocketed since 2010.

Denver used to have homicide totals in the 30s quite often since 2000 with a spike every now and then, now it's usually in the 60s. They were at 64 but havent updated since November 2nd.

Lakewood, Aurora, Commerce City, Northglenn, Sheridan, Brighton, Greeley and several other suburbs have lots of violent crime rate also. The high-crime is dispersed throughout the metro area.

The only really low crime areas are Douglas County which is mainly McMansions and is very Republican, Boulder which mainly only millionaires can purchase a home in so they price the problems out and parts of Jefferson County like Wheat Ridge and Applewood that are mainly retirees.

Each and every time I go I am appaled by the condition of the city, except for a small area of Downtown. Denver puts an amazing show for the tourists and comes across as utopian in very small micro-areas but in general Denver has lots of violent crime and social issues and it's spread out far more than a majority of metro areas.

Denver puts on the ultimate act for tourism oriented areas. They have spent billions of the downtown and sure there is a very dense area of very fancy skyscrapers and highrise lofts that give the impression that it's a utopian area.

All one needs to do is take the buses down Colfax, Federal and Sheridan to see what a highly dysfunctional city is that is completely saturated drug use, alcoholism, homeless and crime issues but few people, especially tourists subject themselves to those areas.

Denver is awash and flooded with strong marijuana, meth, heroin and fentanyl is coming in by the brick because of the residents appetite for different drugs.

The crime that is going on much of the Front Range is appaling these days. The area has sky-high suicide rates and drug overdoses.

There is an unavoidable thug culture also that has infested all but Douglas and Boulder county.

https://www.denvergov.org/content/de...crime-map.html

https://www.westword.com/news/more-d...-2018-11365583

Phoenix is not a ghost town, but it gives the impression of being one based on the Downtown. No matter how much they try Downtown Phoenix is way behind Downtown Gilbert, Chandler, Scottsdale, Tempe.

I have been in Arizona on and off for years and rarely went to Phoenix because Phoenix pound for pound has very, very little compared to Tempe, Gilbert, Scottsdale and Chandler.

Phoenix also has extremely high violent crime rates and many areas close to Downtown are extremely dangerous even in broad daylight, compared to many of the vibrant, incredible suburbs that have so much to offer, with very low crime and very little negative social influences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2019, 11:05 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,251,551 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Red Road View Post
Ok Boomer.

You forgot to include that you walked 10 miles each way (Uphill) to school.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
I though under MrT we where all doing biggly? Lots of jobs - money in the bank and a chicken in every pot! This does not add up ! Oh oh I get it the slum lords under capitalism have rents jacked up because nobody can afford the house that 5 yrs ago was $200k. Now $750K. Well isn’t MrT economy fixing all this ?
Losers remain losers, no matter the economy.

And no, LLs can't "jack" the rent up and get the gov't to cover their every whim for those on the section 8 life plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top