Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-02-2020, 04:47 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonyafd View Post
Summary judgement was designed to get rid of frivolous cases, like bus accidents where the victim was actually a bystander with no injuries.
Summary judgement is used to dismiss lawsuits against you when your Garmin records them driving into you in reverse.


The Constitution does no provide for a rogue President working with a rogue Senate leader.
The why didn't they get rid of clinton and obama and THEIR Senate leaders like reid?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2020, 04:54 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
that's how sham investigations are handled.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
McConnell has them by the short hairs.

House want more witnesses, more evidence? ...should have gone through the courts to try and get them. Now they expect McConnell to do it? Most preposterous thing I've ever heard.

trump wins, you lose, again and again....lol
"House want more witnesses, more evidence?" Why didn't THEY get them, they had the power. In the end they claimed they HAD ALL THEY NEEDED and voted accordingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 04:57 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazee Cat Lady View Post
The truth, plain and simple.

(If they could exonerate Trump, he would be demanding that they testify.)


Exactly....and McConnell is one of the worst, most corrupt politicians in our country.



The Senate's job is to try the impeachment case in a trial, before taking a vote...not try to sweep it under a rug, and pretend it doesn't exist.





McConnell and a lot of GOP Senators need to lose their seats over this. They care nothing for the rule of law or truth...and insist on putting their own personal interests and party over the interests of our Country and the rule of law.
It is why Comey, a lifelong Republican told people during the last election if they care anything at all about our Country, the only thing that they can do right now, is to get out and vote for the Democratic candidates. The same thing holds true today. I believe that strongly...and I was a Republican myself for over 4 decades.
"
Quote:
Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?
The truth, plain and simple."


If the House felt they were so crusal, why didn't THEY cal them?


WHY did they VOTE WITHOUT having them testify and claim it was "slam dunk"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:01 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Impeach began. Trump was impeached.

Why would there be a rush to get it to the Senate when Republican Senators have indicated that they will:

1. Refuse to read the evidence
2. Work hand-in-hand with Trump's lawyer
3. not be impartial at all.

It will be interesting when they all have to take the oath for impartiality, etc!

Guess Lindsay will have to raise his right hand and promptly lie under oath.
"Impeach began. Trump was impeached. " Many experts, even some dems law experts, one who was called by the dems in nadler's "hearings", say he is NOT impeached UNTIL the articles are presented to the Senate.

It is like in a real trial, the jury has taken a vote and have NOT yet given their verdict to the judge. Until then, the accused has NOT been found guilty OR not guilty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:04 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
McConnell has announced he's not impartial, there will be no witnesses, no evidence. Just a quick vote.

Why won't McConnell let Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, and Bolton testify? What are they afraid of?

McConnell is complicit, he is a co-conspirator in Trump's obstruction of justice. The Senate sham trial is a massive cover-up.

Let's get all of the evidence, all of the testimony, out on the table. Don't hide it from the Senators, and don't hide it from We the People. Where's the transparency?

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/for...ith-witnesses/
In this country, we also have due process as in Trump gets to question his accuser Eric Ciaremella. But that didn't matter much to you did it?

btw He's not a whistleblower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:06 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
Why can't we the voters hear from Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo? THEY WORK FOR US THE AMERICAN CITIZEN.


Why do you want us not too?

Trump wants the Whistleblower to testify but Trump won't testify.
"Why can't we the voters hear from Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo?"

Why didn't the House NOT call them if what they have to say is so important?

Why did the House VOTE if they did NOT have ALL the evidence it is now claiming is needed?

If all this info IS need, what does that say about the vote the dems made WITHOUT IT?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:15 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
READ: Articles Of Impeachment Against President Trump

https://www.npr.org/2019/12/10/78657...resident-trump

It's worth noting you agree Mr. Trump has been impeached, personally I'm glad to hear as no one's interest is being served by clinging onto nonsensical arguments.

Now that we're over that nonexistent hurdle, don't you think it's about time the White House offers up a viable defense?

On impeachment, Trump’s defenders have no defense

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/pegg...ave-no-defense
"On impeachment, Trump’s defenders have no defense" If tis is the case WHY are MORE witness's required?


The dems are DAMN SURE which is why the voted WITHOUT any addition testimony.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:20 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
There was conclusive testimony and evidence. Trump didn't disappoint.
"There was conclusive testimony and evidence"

Then WHY won't pelosi deliver the articles?

WHY is she and other dems DEM DEMANDING MORE witness's and testimony?

Are you admitting the House voted to impeach WITHOUT ALL THE RELEVANT INFO to do so?

Can't have it BOTH ways!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:22 AM
 
46,281 posts, read 27,099,738 times
Reputation: 11126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
You've got to be kidding.

I don't need to "prove you wrong", let the people decide.


You cannot....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 05:33 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
You cannot....
Surely you jest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top