Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You could argue lot of people 'deserve' to be killed, but assassinations are not the solution to get rid of heads of states or their generals. If we were at war with a nation, then generals would be free game, but we are not at war.
Did you ever make one criticism here when Obama/Biden started 3 wars and moved 150,000 troops in Afghanistan? Did you ever offer up any condolences for the 10s of 1000s who died in those needless wars started by Obama/Biden. I'm guessing not, but feel free to prove me wrong on that one.
We know where this is coming from. You hate Trump. Trump kills them you critcize. Trump doesn't kill them, you criticize. It's called TDS and all of us here know you have it big time.
Right now... nothing has happened in the Middle East.
Sorry - this has nothing to do with impeachment. Intelligence was gathered, and an action was taken.
If nothing else - Trump has benefited from impeachment - so that claim is baseless.
No, nothing has happened as of yet. They'll have their time of mourning first. Trump needed a diversion from what is going on at home. I'll never be convinced otherwise.
No one here has the foggiest idea of who he was, nor would it matter if they did. We are just sent the bill and told it was necessary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest
They won a long time ago.
"They" have been after Iran for decades, but no one was biting. I'm getting tired of "they", and I'm tired of paying "their" bills.
And I'm Conservative. I refuse to allow "they" to tell me how to think and to whom I'm supposed to be blood thirsty against - because it's just like scoring a touch down at the high school homecoming game. Think of the accolades! We can pat ourselves on the back for yet again stupidly involving ourselves in this area of the world. "They" set this up a long, long, long time ago, and we continue to do their bidding. I'm over it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacommonwealth
I guess you could say President Trump warned Iran. Bellicose isolationism
No, nothing has happened as of yet. They'll have their time of mourning first. Trump needed a diversion from what is going on at home. I'll never be convinced otherwise.
I hired Trump, to take out Iran's top leaders, that have sworn death to America..
You could argue lot of people 'deserve' to be killed, but assassinations are not the solution to get rid of heads of states or their generals. If we were at war with a nation, then generals would be free game, but we are not at war.
I'm sorry. I should have clarified. He deserved to die. He was evil for sure. I think Trump made a misguided calculation though, and who the hell knows how it will affect us?
"They" have been after Iran for decades, but no one was biting. I'm getting tired of "they", and I'm tired of paying "their" bills.
And I'm Conservative. I refuse to allow "they" to tell me how to think and to whom I'm supposed to be blood thirsty against - because it's just like scoring a touch down at the high school homecoming game. Think of the accolades! We can pat ourselves on the back for yet again stupidly involving ourselves in this area of the world. "They" set this up a long, long, long time ago, and we continue to do their bidding. I'm over it.
That tweet from Trump was posted in July 2018.
Memo to our sworn enemies: The USA is under new management.
According to the Pentagon, Soleimani was planning a major, imminent attack on American targets at the time of his demise.
...
President Trump demonstrated Friday that America possesses superior intelligence. The attack could only disabuse Tehran of the illusion that Mr. Trump is a paper tiger. Yet, it was Soleimani’s life project to build Iran’s strength by mobilizing regional proxies, rather than Iran’s own army, to strike when he so commanded.
Yet his go-to terror proxy, Hezbollah, is now widely despised in Lebanon. Blood-soaked Syrians are similarly appalled by Soleimani’s foreign militias that kept their butcher in chief, Bashar Assad, in power. Yemenis similarly suffer, and even in Gaza, where Soleimani recently made some inroads, many secretly rue his tactic of propping up militias while bonding them in blind loyalty to Tehran.
Hundreds of thousands were killed in these countries in recent years as a direct result of Soleimani’s activity. He was responsible for the death of hundreds of Yanks as well. Yet things started deteriorating even in neighboring Iraq. In November 2018 Shiite civilians burned pictures of Basra’s Soleimani-installed governor, Asaad al-Eidani. A year later protest spread from the oil-rich but water-parched south to the rest of the country.
I'm sorry. I should have clarified. He deserved to die. He was evil for sure. I think Trump made a misguided calculation though, and who the hell knows how it will affect us?
If you truly believe this, then how about letting the Commander in Chief do his job with the information that he has, instead of armchair quarter backing based on political bias.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
