Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And how do you supposed we are to annihilate them? Nuks? Yeah that would work well.
that was iran's strategy when they played Obama.
Iran used the threat of nukes to get unprecedented funding from Obama to do what they do best, asymmetrical warfare, terrorism and infiltration of violence and government takeover on ME countries.
Iran wasn't going to use nukes, wow, they were sure surprised when Obama cleared the path for that dream with only a 10 year moratorium plus more cash than they ever hoped to continue setting fire to the ME.
Iranian people will now overthrow the mullahs as this is their best chance ever.
Sorry, we can't wipe out 100 million people just because we don't like that part of the world. Trump's assassination of the Iranian general was what the Dr. ordered. We sent a clear message and we saved American lives. But going beyond what he did, would be the wrong strategy.
this^^. we did what we needed to do, anything more would have been overkill.
I think the president should gather the top leaders in the congress, and top advisers to him and meet in the war room to discuss the complete annihilation of Iran, Iraq, and Syria.
The sooner they are destroyed, the better for all.
They are a cancer that needs to be destroyed.
If this were done, the rest of the world would look up to the United States as a country NOT to be messed with.
Why have all these nuclear bombs, if they aren't going to be used?
What is the sense of having them?
It's like buying a new vehicle, and letting it sit in the driveway, or garage, and never drive it.
Many are to young to remember when President Truman bombed japan to end WWII.
No one took on the United States because of that, and things remained fairly quiet until the Korean war in 1952.
I feel wiping that part of the middle east off the planet would be great for the rest of the world.
No long term war, just complete destruction, over and done with.
Something need to be done, and soon to end this incredibly foolish, and dysfunctional part of the world.
Bob.
How old are you? Are you in middle school?
Your post is a completely useless idea and if someone needs explaining, you haven't learned about the world enough.
Nah .... Just "hold what you got" so to speak. See if Iran wants to resume terror attacks, and if they still want to play, show them how rough it can be.
They can't win. Not against Trump.
A lot of people think that a nuclear war in the Middle East will kick-start the Rapture and the apocalypse foretold in the Book of Revelation. Do we really want to take that gamble?
Unfortunately we may not have a choice.
If you really want choice No. Korea, China, or Cuba is the place to be !!!
This week US forces killed a terrorist in a foreign country. He was not a citizen of that country.
Liberals began saying stupid things.
But in May, 2011, US forces killed a different terrorist in a different country. He was not a citizen of that country. His name was Osama bin Laden. Liberals praised Obama.
TDS runs deep. Liberals ain't smart.
And for both times, the US did not have permission from the country to do so.
Would you be mad if another country killed a terrorist in the US? I see Germany is quite upset with Russia that Russia (suspected) killed one in Germany.
Do you think the US should be free to conduct incursions and airstrikes in countries without permission of the country? Do you offer the same deal for other countries to do so in the US?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.