Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You have stated it shouldn't be allowed in your opinion. Why is that?
Don't worry, I don't expect you to answer the question. Anyone still reading this knows why you won't.
Abortion law is based on privacy. You are nit picking again. My opinion isn’t that it shouldn’t be allowed, I personally would not abort a healthy baby late term. I support this law.
Wow, what a vote of no confidence this is for all the existing Democrat candidates! Another thread begs Meaghan Markle to run for President too. Do Dems think this little of their candidates that they are begging actresses to step in and save the day? Looks like another 4 years for the Trumpster.
Status:
"A solution in search of a problem"
(set 25 days ago)
Location: New York Area
34,582 posts, read 16,645,682 times
Reputation: 29733
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus
Wow, what a vote of no confidence this is for all the existing Democrat candidates! Another thread begs Meaghan Markle to run for President too. Do Dems think this little of their candidates that they are begging actresses to step in and save the day? Looks like another 4 years for the Trumpster.
...after her "I had an abortion now clap for me" Golden Globes speech. And where she said women need to vote in their self interest” by voting for more women politicians, even though not all female politicians are Democrats or pro choice! Lol!
We need to remember that just because someone SUGGESTED her for POTUS doesn't mean she has the desire to run. They did this same thing with Oprah. Oprah had no actually plans on running.
Abortion law is based on privacy. You are nit picking again. My opinion isn’t that it shouldn’t be allowed, I personally would not abort a healthy baby late term. I support this law.
You disagree with the law, but you support it.
This is the end result of extremism. You know it is wrong but as soon as there is any restriction on abortion you also know it leads to questions that are difficult to reconcile. Hence we get extremist laws and moral people supporting them when they know they are wrong.
Status:
"A solution in search of a problem"
(set 25 days ago)
Location: New York Area
34,582 posts, read 16,645,682 times
Reputation: 29733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussiehoff
You disagree with the law, but you support it.
This is the end result of extremism. You know it is wrong but as soon as there is any restriction on abortion you also know it leads to questions that are difficult to reconcile. Hence we get extremist laws and moral people supporting them when they know they are wrong.
The posting sequence is a bit confusing but I support legalized abortion, to the fourth month or so, even though I know it is wrong. Quite frankly, it's not my decision to make.
Unfortunately, high schoolers are going to do what they're going to do, and the question really is how you distribute the consequences. To society, to either raise children the high-schoolers can't, or aren't going to. I'm not sure it's best if a high-schooler for forgoes her education, and/or if the "father" forgoes his education, all because of a roll in the hay.On the other hand...it's certainly not shoes I would want to walk in.
This is the end result of extremism. You know it is wrong but as soon as there is any restriction on abortion you also know it leads to questions that are difficult to reconcile. Hence we get extremist laws and moral people supporting them when they know they are wrong.
I will not second guess a woman’s choice I don’t know, or that of her doctor. Her life her choice. Something that maybe wrong for me personally doesn’t make it wrong for someone else. Women have the right to medical privacy just as a man does.
I will not second guess a woman’s choice I don’t know, or that of her doctor. Her life her choice. Something that maybe wrong for me personally doesn’t make it wrong for someone else. Women have the right to medical privacy just as a man does.
I understand the rationalisation you are forced to grapple with in support of something you know is wrong. And your adherence to the approved talking points, even bringing medical privacy into it, is admirable.
But as you agree, it is wrong to kill a full term healthy baby. You know it, we all know it and we all know why you can't give the reason it is wrong. Thankyou for engaging in a respectful manner. I am glad you are now better informed on the laws and have a clearer understanding of why this component of it is so abhorrent.
The posting sequence is a bit confusing but I support legalized abortion, to the fourth month or so, even though I know it is wrong. Quite frankly, it's not my decision to make.
Unfortunately, high schoolers are going to do what they're going to do, and the question really is how you distribute the consequences. To society, to either raise children the high-schoolers can't, or aren't going to. I'm not sure it's best if a high-schooler for forgoes her education, and/or if the "father" forgoes his education, all because of a roll in the hay.On the other hand...it's certainly not shoes I would want to walk in.
I think the vast majority of people agree with your stance.
Some however, pretend they are supportive of laws that allow the discarding of full term healthy babies by saying "but it will never happen". Some don't even believe that is the law until you show them the actual legislation. But this is where we are at in the abortion debate these days. It will never be solved whilst there are people willing to defend the indefensible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.