Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2020, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Interesting idea, except the guy is challenging a woman to fight till death, unless her lawyer wants to take her place.


Man requests 'trial by combat' to settle dispute with ex-wife

https://wjla.com/news/offbeat/man-re...LDEXNIiGWTXceQ

To this day, trial by combat has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States. [It was used] as recently as 1818 in British Court.

Ostrom asked the court to give him 12 weeks to source and forge the Japanese katana and wakizashi swords that he wishes to use in combat.


Ostrom says his ex-wife can have her attorney stand in as her "Champion."

Her attorney, Matthew Hudson, responded to the request by filing a resistance to the trial by combat by first correcting Ostrom's spelling:

Surely [Ostrom] meant 'corporeal' bodies which Merriam Webster defines as having, consisting of, or relating to, a physical material body. Although [Ostrom] and potential combatant do have souls to be rended, they respectfully request that the court not order this done. It should be noted that just because the U.S. and Iowa constitutions do not specifically prohibit battling another person with a deadly katana sword, it does prohibit a court sitting in equity from ordering same.

 
Old 01-15-2020, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Boulder, CO
2,066 posts, read 901,317 times
Reputation: 3489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Ostrom asked the court to give him 12 weeks to source and forge the Japanese katana and wakizashi swords that he wishes to use in combat.

"For my champion, I choose … The Mountain !"
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADogNamedSam View Post
"For my champion, I choose … The Mountain !"
I assume the ex-wife is not Brienne of Tarth.
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:17 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,595,161 times
Reputation: 8925
If his challenge states only "her lawyer" I bet she can find a lawyer with uber sword skills... just saying.
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:25 AM
 
15,531 posts, read 10,504,683 times
Reputation: 15812
Okay this made me laugh, I'm bad.
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
If his challenge states only "her lawyer" I bet she can find a lawyer with uber sword skills... just saying.
Her attorney = Matthew Hudson, as stated in the article.
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:28 AM
 
36,530 posts, read 30,871,648 times
Reputation: 32796
Can she use a gun?
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:29 AM
 
18,381 posts, read 19,023,642 times
Reputation: 15700
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADogNamedSam View Post
"For my champion, I choose … The Mountain !"
Certainly not Oberyn Martell that show off
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,558 posts, read 10,635,195 times
Reputation: 36573
Is the ex-wife allowed to choose her weapon? If so, I'm thinking a semi-automatic ought to top a katana.
 
Old 01-15-2020, 11:43 AM
 
8,168 posts, read 3,128,220 times
Reputation: 4501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Interesting idea, except the guy is challenging a woman to fight till death, unless her lawyer wants to take her place.


Man requests 'trial by combat' to settle dispute with ex-wife

https://wjla.com/news/offbeat/man-re...LDEXNIiGWTXceQ

To this day, trial by combat has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States. [It was used] as recently as 1818 in British Court.

Ostrom asked the court to give him 12 weeks to source and forge the Japanese katana and wakizashi swords that he wishes to use in combat.


Ostrom says his ex-wife can have her attorney stand in as her "Champion."

Her attorney, Matthew Hudson, responded to the request by filing a resistance to the trial by combat by first correcting Ostrom's spelling:

Surely [Ostrom] meant 'corporeal' bodies which Merriam Webster defines as having, consisting of, or relating to, a physical material body. Although [Ostrom] and potential combatant do have souls to be rended, they respectfully request that the court not order this done. It should be noted that just because the U.S. and Iowa constitutions do not specifically prohibit battling another person with a deadly katana sword, it does prohibit a court sitting in equity from ordering same.
This guy has taken the movie Kill Bill too seriously.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top