Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Anyone with a brain would realize not all crimes are impeachable, its embarrassing for you that its even being brought up..
Well, if the House majority is corrupt enough, literally anything is impeachable. All you need is the votes. Valid reason is not a requirement at all as we're seeing now.
Now, here this is according to the Constitutional Rights Foundation
What are “high crimes and misdemeanors”? On first hearing this phrase, many people probably think that it is just an 18th century way of saying “felonies and misdemeanors.” Felonies are major crimes and misdemeanors are lesser crimes. If this interpretation were correct, “high crimes and misdemeanors” would simply mean any crime. But this interpretation is mistaken.
Epic failure.
The first person to be impeached, all the way back in 1804 - when most of the Founding Fathers were still alive - was John Pickering, who was impeached for chronic intoxication. Jefferson himself oversaw the impeachment, and the senate voted to remove him.
Chronic intoxication isn't even a crime, let alone a misdemeanor, high or otherwise. And yet he was impeached and removed.
Are you referring to Joe Biden when he threatened to withhold 6 billion dollars in aid to Ukraine until they fired the Ukrainian official who was investigating Hunter Biden?
No one, Ukrainian or otherwise was ever investigating Hunter. Did you choose to lie or are you simply that ignorant about reality? Has to be one or the other.
Well, if the House majority is corrupt enough, literally anything is impeachable. All you need is the votes. Valid reason is not a requirement at all as we're seeing now.
Which is why the founders of the country requires 2/3 vote from the Senate to remove.. they didn't want a President to be removed for political reasons, which is what the House tried to do.
Which is why the founders of the country requires 2/3 vote from the Senate to remove.. they didn't want a President to be removed for political reasons, which is what the House tried to do.
Right. Unfortunately for Democrats, the matter now goes to the adults in the Senate and that'll be the end of it. That's why they are throwing such a fit right now throwing as much nonsense against the wall hoping something will stick. It's very much like how much louder Baghdad Bob got towards the end. There is a sense of desperation to it all.
Then how do you explain that Claudia Rosett (New York Post) uncovered a string of 13 identical money transfers of $99,999,999.99 each (one cent less than $100 million), paid out of an obscure Treasury Department stash known as the “Judgment Fund.” The transfers were made on 1/19/16, just two days after the administration announced it had reached the $1.7 billion settlement with Iran. They total just 13 cents shy of $1.3 billion, the same amount Kerry’s State Department claims Iran was owed in “interest” from the $400 million the U.S. government had been holding.
Hypocrisy much?
How do you explain why such a "stunning crime" wasn't investigated by the Republican majority in the house in 2016?
Most intelligent people want to live in a country minus cultists who support criminality and over-the-top corruption in their government. Not too much to ask.
Why do you keep referring to the Barracks Hussein Obama administration?
You can yawn, but I believe Trump is wide awake, lol. I'm not the one being impeached for abusing his office.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.