Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-19-2020, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,521,957 times
Reputation: 24780

Advertisements

Last week he released a whole lot more than that.

tRump can't be pleased.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2020, 08:18 AM
 
26,562 posts, read 14,434,478 times
Reputation: 7421
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville View Post
Every star struck fan who snags a picture with Elton John or Jennifer Lopez, does that mean the fan "knows" Jennifer?

if it was a single photo in a public space you'd have a point, but it isn't. there are already multiple photos of parnas with trump and multiple photos of parnas with trump family and associates including photos of trump having breakfast with jay sukelo, guiliani, trump jr and a photo signed by melania and trump directly thanking parnas for his hard work and leadership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,233 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15621
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
2 very Simple questions: Did the house have enough evidence to impeach the president with?


Why should or would the senate need to do anything more, then review the evidence that was provided to them, that was sufficient enough to be impeached in the house?
Evidently yes but the republicans don't seem to believe so, why cant we get answers to simple questions on the delayed foreign aid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 08:47 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,512,088 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
if it was a single photo in a public space you'd have a point, but it isn't. there are already multiple photos of parnas with trump and multiple photos of parnas with trump family and associates including photos of trump having breakfast with jay sukelo, guiliani, trump jr and a photo signed by melania and trump directly thanking parnas for his hard work and leadership.
Hell, there's a freakin' video of him with Trump.

LOL.

But, once again, Trump 'hardly knows the guy".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 08:54 AM
 
46,261 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Evidently yes but the republicans don't seem to believe so,

Well, they have to look at it...why add anything that was enough to impeach the president in the house? Unless it was just pure hate that got the vote...and I can guarantee at least 2 votes were pure hate for trump, nothing more, nothing less....





Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
why cant we get answers to simple questions on the delayed foreign aid.

How can something be delayed, when it arrives prior to the deadline? Anything that arrives prior to the deadline is not delayed in anyway, shape, or form....



Now, if it held up until after the deadline, then you'd have something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 03:17 PM
 
20,758 posts, read 8,562,401 times
Reputation: 14393
It's funny that some MSM news talking heads seemed to have finally learned their lesson from the Avenutti debacle. Even Fake Crapper doesn't believe Parnass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 03:27 PM
 
26,562 posts, read 14,434,478 times
Reputation: 7421
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
.....learned their lesson from the Avenutti debacle.

as far as stormy daniels was concerned avenatti was correct. trump's own legal filings showed that trump had an affair with daniels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,099 posts, read 8,998,912 times
Reputation: 18745
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
as far as stormy daniels was concerned avenatti was correct. trump's own legal filings showed that trump had an affair with daniels.
at this point wouldn't you agree nobody cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,099 posts, read 8,998,912 times
Reputation: 18745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuele View Post
You will not hear from Parnas. he is unvetted. If he is called, rebuttal character witnesses will be called to assist in undermining his credibility. The Dems can’t have that, they have campaigns, Primaries and an election to lose. Parnas is under indictment. Based on that, he is only a witness for the TV shows.

Putting someone under indictment as a witness in front of a Jury of mostly lawyers ? Seriously?

As it is there isn’t any timeline when the trial will end. The longer it goes, the worse for the Dems.Just imagine, Joe, Hunter, Adam, Nadler , Debbie Waserman Shultz, and yes, the actual whistle blower, his former co worker that works for Adam, etc. All fair game.

And on the other side of the coin, Trump claims Executive Priv, so no Bolton, Mulvaney , Pompeo. Roberts will not rule them in. Just as the Court has stayed away previously.

McConnell is running the show now, not Nancy.He will act to protect the Repub Senators that are up for reelection. He will seek to navigate a course with the least amount of damage. Not so much for the Dems however, they could be looking like the Titanic in no time.
no chance Parnas is called, they're not bringing in some clown out on bail from multi-count felony federal indictments into the Senate to testify against the President of the USA. The very idea of it is absurd.


Pelosi and Schiff want to hear Parnas? Start new investigations, call Schiff, schedule hearings and issue subpeonas if you want.

Roberts is just there to make sure the Senate follows the Senate rules. Once McConnell and the Republicans disallow all but direct testimony, that's the rule Roberts follows. Appears there's some confusion over his role.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2020, 03:36 PM
 
20,758 posts, read 8,562,401 times
Reputation: 14393
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
at this point wouldn't you agree nobody cares?

Desperate Deranged Dems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top