Lev Parnas: I’ll Release a Photo Each Time Trump Denies Knowing Me (Rudy Giuliani, dollars)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I count Trump admitting on live TV that he committed a crime as one his many gotcha moment. But I reckon his cult followers would willfully remain ignorant.
I’m not confused at all, you are.
First off I entertained your assertion even though Impeachment is not a Legal Process. It is Political. There was much discussion on the issue in the Federalist Papers, and what developed is present today.
That being stated, I never said the reasonable person standard wasn’t used in a Jury Trial.What I am saying is that the standard is not an absolute. What is reasonable to one person, may not be to another. Reasonable is an opinion. You can’t make a blanket statement of someone’s guilt or innocence based on a standard without due process. The entire process. When all efforts have been exhausted. Beyond a reasonable doubt is then adhered to regarding guilt.
If I understand you correctly you are trying to say a reasonable person finds Trump guilty based on what has
been heard. That’ s not the way our system works. Innocent unless Proven Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
A presumption of innocence. The POTUS doesn’t have to prove his innocence.
Without due process , you can’t come to a decision of guilt or innocence.
So you harangue another poster for failing to recognize that impeachment is not a legal process but a political one, but then you inexplicably apply concepts only present in criminal processes ("presumption of innocence" and "beyond a reasonable doubt") to the impeachment process? You are indeed confused.
I count Trump admitting on live TV that he committed a crime as one his many gotcha moment. But I reckon his cult followers would willfully remain ignorant.
So what, I stated an opinion on a matter not related to Impeachment. I have that right. I actually deleted the post because the silliness of Dem supporters lately as their ship is sinking and is reaching into the Theatre of the Absurd.
Circling and circling, spinning and spinning, where is the “ evidence in plain sight”
Where?
Yes, you do have the right to be provably and woefully incorrect. As (presumably) an American, you have the right to proudly wear your conceptional contradictions and ignorance as a badge of pride and no one can take that away from you.
What better way to troll Trump and all his lies than with undeniable evidence.
Trump has taught his devotees one thing - the more outrageous the lie, the harder you push back when it is uncovered. Watch as his defenders come up with new and ever more creative pretzel logic to defend the indefensible. This is the real lasting legacy of Trump, our move away from facts and into the fantasy land of populist imagination.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
