Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No it's about mcconnel and his collusion with trump to avoid a serious trial were EVERYONE knows will result in removal. Propaganda anyone? Can I get extra cheese with that that load of cr@p?
"EVERYONE knows will result in removal" Do you really believe that? Like Schiff, you seem to think putting down those that disagree with you are going to be swayed by insulting them and their beliefs - you must live in a real hellish world.
But it the Senate doesn't take any stock in the House investigation, they should definitely do their own. Insist that witness be called, documents reviewed, tapes listened to, ...
Time to get the facts on the table.
Not the Senates job, the House should have done their job and gone through the process if they wanted witnesses "to get the facts on the table".
Actually not true (I think you meant offense instead of defense) - historically, has never been charged in any other impeachment.
You also seem to want to ignore that Grand Juries hear the evidence presented by the investigators, this is the first time that congress did not have an independent investigation for ANY impeachment inquiry, The house (grand jury) while acting as investigators , blocked almost half of the "grand jury" from hearing some of the evidence, asking questions or taking an active roll in the investigation.
This was a one sided "railroad" investigation, definitely not impartial seekers of facts - why should the senate take much stock in this "investigation".
Hmmm. And why is that? Because in the limited history of presidential impeachment all of the accused cooperated with Congress by providing witnesses and documents.
The case is weak, that's why the democrats are demanding witnesses.
The democrats know that have no possible chance to win this case, so they want to try to muddy the waters by calling witnesses that have privileged information.
Its all about optics for the dems because they know they have no case.
Man turn of your shuffle option. You keep repeating the same old song!
I'm amazed that Republicans think the Republicans did well today and that Democrats think the Democraats did well earlier in the week! Shocked, I tell ya!
That would be best, because you can't win that argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralphfr
Hmmm. And why is that? Because in the limited history of presidential impeachment all of the accused cooperated with Congress by providing witnesses and documents.
That was beacuse
1. The House held a vote to authorize an impeachment investigation.
2. They went to the courts to determine the issues of executive privilege.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
