Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Have any of you trump supporters read the Articles? The evidence of bribery is spelled out quite clearly in fact the detail of impeachable acts could also be interpreted to include extortion. To say that he cannot be impeached for it because it doesn't include the word bribery is WRONG!!!
Have any if you trump supporters read the Articles? The evidence of bribery is spelled out quite clearly in fact the detail of impeachable acts could also be interpreted to include extortion. To say that he cannot be impeached for it because it doesn't include the word bribery is WRONG!!!
Save us time and tell us what line that is clearly spelled out on. Should be easy since all the lines are numbered.
You are correct that the prosecution must prove guilt. However, you got that second part wrong. In a trial the defense does not have to prove innocence, they only have to provide doubt to guilt. Trump’s motive as to why he withheld aid is the entire basis of the charges against him. If there was an alternative reason he withheld aid then he is not guilty. For instance, an employer may not like that his employee dates people of another race but the employee can’t claim they were fired based on discrimination if they were caught stealing (an actual case). Whether or not Trump had reason to believe Biden engaged in corruption is probably the single most important factor in his defense, if we are comparing it to a trial in the real world. Absolutely, both Bidens would appropriately be called as witnesses in a trial.
I find this opinion specious at best. This is not a criminal trial. BOTH sides SHOULD be working for the people, not the accused. To believe that republican resistance in both Houses of Congress has anything to do with defending our right to an untainted vote, the most sacrosanct of citizen's rights in this country is ridiculous. It's republican's partisanship that is in the wrong here. And the fact that trump voters DO NOT CARE is unfathomable!
I find this opinion specious at best. This is not a criminal trial. BOTH sides SHOULD be working for the people, not the accused. To believe that republican resistance in both Houses of Congress has anything to do with defending our right to an untainted vote, the most sacrosanct of citizen's rights in this country is ridiculous. It's republican's partisanship that is in the wrong here. And the fact that trump voters DO NOT CARE is unfathomable!
The majority of americans, including independents, wanted to see witnesses. They know what a trial should look like.
Even assuming the person accused of being the whistleblower is in fact the whistleblower, your little meme doesn't even have the alleged whistleblower's name spelled correctly. More importantly, it is not actually a picture of the alleged whistleblower, although the person pictured is Schiff's daughter's boyfriend and does apparently have the same first name as the alleged whistleblower.
But keep spreading your lies. You only expose yourself more with each one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bribery and Articles
