Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The dems had their chance to call all witnesses and show documents. They got them all, except those the Prez choose to protect via EP.
Actually this is incorrect, as I believe you would know.
They did not get anything requested from the white house. The white house actually stated they would allow nothing at all.
Even the witnesses who did appear did so in spite of being ordered not to appear, and as far as I am aware no documents at all were released, except those which were inadvertently released through FOIA requests to third parties. This was complete stonewalling.
Agreed, and now they have to present that inadequate case to the senate.
The democrats in the House willingly did not do what was necessary to make a compelling case for impeachment, now they have to live with that decision.
Well, they second article of impeachment will be dismissed. It sure as hell is not an impeachable offense for the president to cite his Right to executive privilege of his inner circle of advisors.
And what do you call that farce that the dems conducted in the house?
Do you call that getting at the truth?
Through out that entire dog and pony show, there was not one shred of verifiable evidence given.
It was all third hand BS .
Bob.
I get tired of this question. The House had enough to put forward articles of impeachment with the evidence they had, which was compromised by trump's edict to WITHHOLD ALL WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE. I cannot make it any clearer than that.
Actually this is incorrect, as I believe you would know.
They did not get anything requested from the white house. The white house actually stated they would allow nothing at all.
Even the witnesses who did appear did so in spite of being ordered not to appear, and as far as I am aware no documents at all were released, except those which were inadvertently released through FOIA requests to third parties. This was complete stonewalling.
You do understand you are contradicting yourself in the post above, yes? (re: the bold)
I get tired of this question. The House had enough to put forward articles of impeachment with the evidence they had, which was compromised by trump's edict to WITHHOLD ALL WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE. I cannot make it any clearer than that.
Then the senate SHOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM REMOVING TRUMP.....yes?
Well, they second article of impeachment will be dismissed. It sure as hell is not an impeachable offense for the president to cite his Right to executive privilege of his inner circle of advisors.
Is that your opinion or more fake news, because nowhere is that being reported.
You do understand you are contradicting yourself in the post above, yes? (re: the bold)
Those are not contradictions. You're trying to invent them just like team Trump, inventing that the process was flawed because they can't defend his actions which he is charged with.
Those are not contradictions. You're trying to invent them just like team Trump, inventing that the process was flawed because they can't defend his actions which he is charged with.
Then the senate SHOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM REMOVING TRUMP.....yes?
Honestly, yes. Even in a criminal trial jurors are instructed that they should use common sense in deliberating. But that won't happen until the witnesses and evidence being held up by trump are entered into the trial because truth is not driving this only political expediency.
Do you? What don't you understand about evidence and witnesses being denied?....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.