Time-lapse video shows massive turnout for 2020 March for Life

[StillwaterTownie]

Originally Posted by GABESTA535

Will red-state voters gladly pay higher taxes to support the education, housing, and medical care of all the additional babies that will be born once they get their dream abortion ban?

No possible way. Oklahoman voters refused to pass a proposal to raise state sales tax by a penny in order to improve funding for all school students, including for higher education.

[rjshae]

Originally Posted by hothulamaui

The estimated 75 to 100 thousand

The 2018 March for our Lives event drew 800,000 to Washington D.C.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJnqoagfVRU

Thanks for playing.

[hothulamaui]

Originally Posted by rjshae

The 2018 March for our Lives event drew 800,000 to Washington D.C.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJnqoagfVRU

Thanks for playing.

This is 2020, what does 2018 numbers have to do with anything?

[Aussiehoff]

Originally Posted by natalie469

I wish the march for life people cared more for the kids already here who are in foster homes and desperately want loving homes. They want them born but don't care what happens to them after that. Why do you want to keep adding to an overloaded system.

I was surprised to see it take 19 posts before someone spouted this nonsense.

[GotHereQuickAsICould]

Originally Posted by natalie469

I wish the march for life people cared more for the kids already here who are in foster homes and desperately want loving homes. They want them born but don't care what happens to them after that. Why do you want to keep adding to an overloaded system.

Making abortion illegal and unobtainable will overload the already strained child protective services and foster care system.

Medicaid, WIC, TANF, ... all these programs would need to be beefed up to handle the increase.

This whole anti-abortion business is about power and control. Not about protecting children.

[GotHereQuickAsICould]

Why are these massive amounts of people not marching to protect the children who are already born and locked in cages at the border?

Or marching to improve funding for foster care, child protective services, Medicaid, WIC, TANF, schools, daycare, ...

Seems like protecting the children already born would be a logical step.

[hothulamaui]

Originally Posted by Aussiehoff

I was surprised to see it take 19 posts before someone spouted this nonsense.

So the 400 thousand kids in foster care don’t matter? Nor the 100 thousand plus kids who are eligible for adoption who wait for a home. How bout twenty plus thousand that age out every year? Why am I not surprised you don’t care

[hothulamaui]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

Why are these massive amounts of people not marching to protect the children who are already born and locked in cages at the border?

Or marching to improve funding for foster care, child protective services, Medicaid, WIC, TANF, schools, daycare, ...

Seems like protecting the children already born would be a logical step.

Let’s not forget all the frozen embryos that never get implanted. These poor little unborn kids stay in the deep freeze for decades.

[rjshae]

Originally Posted by hothulamaui

This is 2020, what does 2018 numbers have to do with anything?

Ask me that in December.

[bus man]

Originally Posted by rjshae

The 2018 March for our Lives event drew 800,000 to Washington D.C.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJnqoagfVRU

Thanks for playing.

According to this source, it was 200,000.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/march-f...ded-d-c-march/

In any case, March For Our Lives was a one-time event. The March for Life has been an annual event since 1974, yet it still manages to draw hundreds of thousands of participants each and every year.