Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So call in Mulvaney and Bolton--there won't be nothing new they really have to offer...
In exchange call in Hunter Biden, Eric Ciaramella--alot we don't know yet
Let's see who has the most skeletons in their closet and who comes out on top...
I already know the answer...
KAG!
"In exchange call in Hunter Biden, Eric Ciaramella-" and shiff. Make HIM back up all the outright lies he has been spewing for over 3 years." I have SEEN the proof"
And you think the attempted coup against Clinton (over a BJ????) had any more legitimacy? Was the Dem's calling out Nixon a coup against Nixon?
The fact that people still claim Clinton was impeached over a bj says a lot about partisanship in this country. Clinton lied under oath while being investigated for sexual harassment. What he lied about was circumstantial to the charges. He committed perjury in front of the entire country, and that was why he was impeached.
That being said, I was only slightly more supportive of the Clinton impeachment than I am of the Trump impeachment. Both are/were non starters from the beginning due to the makeup of the Senate at their respective times. The Clinton impeachment, however, was at least due to an actual crime being committed.
The Trump impeachment is going to lead to further stupidity in Washington, as the Democrats are setting up the next Democratic POTUS for a similar attack. For a group of people who are supposedly smart enough to lead our country, politicians in general are idiots.
" and moved the federal Courts even further right..if that's even possible."
There are still a LOT of "left" judges to be replaced.
Yes there are, however...
Trump's filled 187 vacancies to date, and there's ~100 more pending, and upcomming before his 1st term ends. That's ~287. If re-elected, there's ~80 more to come that are known, and other may arise. He could wind up appointing 367+ of the 870 total. 193 were appointed by Bush (not sure how many of those are still there though). By 2024, the courts will be extremely Conservative for many years to come.
We still need to purge several Libs from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. That's the only stronghold the Libs have left, and Trump's made significant headway there too....more work to do. Dems keep pushing decisions to that court, so it must be flipped asap.
There was a "dry run" at this Ukraine crap awhile back, over the Javelin Missiles conditions of release and Eric C. was all involved, with Schiff's, 2 NSC members staffers.
The fact that people still claim Clinton was impeached over a bj says a lot about partisanship in this country. Clinton lied under oath while being investigated for sexual harassment. What he lied about was circumstantial to the charges. He committed perjury in front of the entire country, and that was why he was impeached.
That being said, I was only slightly more supportive of the Clinton impeachment than I am of the Trump impeachment. Both are/were non starters from the beginning due to the makeup of the Senate at their respective times. The Clinton impeachment, however, was at least due to an actual crime being committed.
The Trump impeachment is going to lead to further stupidity in Washington, as the Democrats are setting up the next Democratic POTUS for a similar attack. For a group of people who are supposedly smart enough to lead our country, politicians in general are idiots.
Similar circumstances allowed Mitchs' Senate to block 105 Obama federal judge appointments, and hand them over instead to Trump. The Dems misapplied a rule, then Mitch used that misaplication as precedence to block Obama's appointments. THAT is how Trump had 105 extra vacancies to fill in the federal courts when he took office. This is a major topic of Mitch's book called The Long Game.
The Dems mis-application of the established impeachment processes/protocols, and the misinterpretation of articles of impeachment WILL come back to haunt them in the future. And, for all that future risk, what did they get? They elevated Trumps poll ratings, teed off American voters who are tired of the partisan tug-o-war, distracted politicians from spending their time/resources to fix real problems, and provided false hopes to their base...again (Hillary's loss, Kavanaugh confirmed, Russia-gate failure, Ukraine failure, Impeachment w/o removal). The Dems have lost credibility by giving their base false hopes, and undelivered promises.
The Dems keep taking increasingly desperate & wild partisan measures, for no net long-term gain. These measures are leaving them vulnerable for what could become much more meaningful retribution from the Republicans down the road. Mitch's book is aptly named. By playing the "long game", the Republicans have retaken control of American politics.
Please don't waste our time posting anti Ingraham stuff. Just comment on the contents.
I happened to be at the Capitol Monday for a long-planned tour. While waiting just outside the Senate chamber to get into my 30-minute rotation of viewing the trial, she came through and walked passed!
The Dems have really screwed the pooch on this one, guaranteeing Trump a win in 2020, where he could have very well lost had they not been on this crusade.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
