Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2020, 01:19 PM
 
18,073 posts, read 18,750,721 times
Reputation: 25191

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
Absolutely. Highest teen birthrate by state:
Arkansas: 32.8
Mississippi: 31.0
Oklahoma: 29.7
Louisiana: 29.1
Kentucky: 29.0
New Mexico: 27.9
Texas: 27.6
West Virginia: 27.1
Alabama: 27.0
Tennessee: 26.6

Why? Because there are only a few times a small town, uneducated girl will feel important and one of them is having a baby. It's a social status deal.
Every state has small towns with uneducated girls though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2020, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,565 posts, read 20,909,470 times
Reputation: 14189
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchlights View Post
This is what you get when you live in a state that continues to reward bad choices and shun personal responsibility.


Hooray for the Leftists utopia.
I bet there’s plenty of babies born to the right - yes red states seem to need more food stamps.
https://bigthink.com/are-blue-states...e-you.amp.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2020, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,615,875 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
IL Republicans tried to pass a law that unwed mothers couldn't get public assistance benefits for themselves and their children unless they named their baby's (babies') father on their birth certificate so the state can try to recoup costs. Naturally, the IL Dems voted that down because it makes too much fiscal sense.

DNA testing could have been used if the father claimed it wasn't his child (children).
As I understand it, TANF requires the establishment of bio paternity as a condition for ongoing eligibility and requires states to establish paternity in 90% of the cases.

The state then pursues the bio father for child support. This can lead to DNA testing. Imagine a percentage of bio fathers have no reported income , or are untraceable or in prison.

Mothers have a cap of 5 years of TANF benefits ( not necessarily consecutive) unless they work or train for work or are in school for at least 20 hours a week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Central Florida
1,329 posts, read 829,326 times
Reputation: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
A female rapper (sorry, can’t remember her name) mocked the whole pop-a-tot thing ten years ago. Her music video was hilarious with smiling women at the hair salon and pushing baby carriages through a sunny California neighborhood. The lyrics were crude: /All you need to do is f***, nine months later you get the big bucks/. She nailed it.

Did you ever consider that the video was perhaps being somewhat satirical for the purposes of goading people, and isn't a realistic portrayal of the motivations of single, black mothers? Alot of hip hop is about goading people based on playing on stereotypes, rather than serious reflections about peoples innermost motivations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 06:58 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,866 posts, read 46,504,056 times
Reputation: 18520
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
Poor women getting pregnant is an addiction that is taking over urban America especially. One right after another they have because they are trying to get first-class service in the safety-net ponzi scheme.

California is especially guilty of it except for San Francisco it's incredible how many babies have one right after another despite the fact they know it is expensive.

San Francisco is the only exception I have seen to the baby factory rule in California. They have babies young and often outside of San Francisco in hopes of scoring a section 8 voucher.

I notice in San Diego, Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Fresno having babies is in addiction for those who are not upper-middle class or above. Tremendous amounts of babies born to those who can't afford housing in Los Angeles, they think that by getting pregnant that the housing inventory can accomodate them and that's not the case.

I was in the El Cajon section of San Diego a few years ago and couldn't believe the amount of people with 3 to 5 kids each. Every business in that area was filled with screaming babies.

Would love to see them completely eliminate housing programs for families with children. They get a housing voucher and have more children because of the housing voucher then they invite parolee's into the home and then end up homeless and in the case of NYC in a luuxury unit.

Same thing with Koreatown, Westlake and Boyle Heights in Los Angeles I was stunned by the amount of children people have there. Why have all those children when you can't pay the going rate on rent or buy a house and need some scheme from socialist tax level city of LA.

Even with the massive fortune cities, states, federal government spends with so many poor families there is no inventory to house them. What they spend doesn't matter because the inventory is not there at all in many cities.

There just isn't the inventory anymore to house them. They tend to very concentrated in very expensive cities because very liberal, very expensive cities have massive welfare schemes so they can't really leave even though there is no inventory.

My reaction is the mothers of these 1.5 million children just had children so they could use their children for what they thought would be for front-line to a coveted section 8 voucher.

Rents are very high mostly because of welfare schemes like section 8 taking housing inventory out of the free market.

In NY there are so families, the mayor is proposing housing them in luxury apartments because that's where the few vacancies are.

https://nypost.com/2020/02/04/homele...r-nyc-program/

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/g...-new-hampshire

https://nche.ed.gov/wp-content/uploa...-1.30.2020.pdf

That is what fascist socialism brings.
You are just PROPERTY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Boston
20,023 posts, read 8,913,884 times
Reputation: 18602
any women getting abortions for non-medical reasons should be sterilized at the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 07:11 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,800 posts, read 44,610,756 times
Reputation: 13625
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
As I understand it, TANF requires the establishment of bio paternity as a condition for ongoing eligibility and requires states to establish paternity in 90% of the cases.

The state then pursues the bio father for child support. This can lead to DNA testing. Imagine a percentage of bio fathers have no reported income , or are untraceable or in prison.

Mothers have a cap of 5 years of TANF benefits ( not necessarily consecutive) unless they work or train for work or are in school for at least 20 hours a week.
What's the time limit on SNAP, and other public assistance benefits for mothers and their children when the father is not named on the birth certificate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 07:14 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,800 posts, read 44,610,756 times
Reputation: 13625
Quote:
Originally Posted by DT113876 View Post
Did you ever consider that the video was perhaps being somewhat satirical for the purposes of goading people, and isn't a realistic portrayal of the motivations of single, black mothers? Alot of hip hop is about goading people based on playing on stereotypes, rather than serious reflections about peoples innermost motivations.
Except for Chapter's specific commentary at the beginning of the video: "Public Service Announcement: This is where the taxpayer money goes."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,565 posts, read 20,909,470 times
Reputation: 14189
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
any women getting abortions for non-medical reasons should be sterilized at the same time.
As well as the father or he can be given the baby at birth and she can walk away ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2020, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,783 posts, read 26,093,782 times
Reputation: 33927
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
PP does not have 2,000 clinics. It doesnt even have 1,000 (PP has only about 650 clinics, with most located in metropolitan areas where there are already public Title X clinics). And, yes, no/low-income women qualify for free or very low-cost contraceptive services, meds, and devices at Title X clinics. They don't even have to be on Medicaid to qualify. That's the entire point of the hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer Title X funding.
Try reading this:

https://www.kff.org/interactive/the-...nning-program/

That study shows that in Vermont there were 11 title X sites, and after Trump's "new rules" all 11 are withdrawing. Now explain to me how birth control will be free and readily available to the residents of that state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top