Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Never heard of this website but the article is originally from the Daily Wire.
Quote:
Although you have likely not heard much about it from the media, the Democrats recently unveiled a plan to illegally add an element of their radical, intersectional agenda to the text of the U.S. Constitution. The controversial amendment could eliminate all laws that recognize biological differences between men and women, and it could force taxpayers to fund abortion-on-demand. Worse yet, their actions come decades after the Left tried and failed to convince Americans to adopt the proposed amendment democratically. Congressional Democrats’ plot to declare victory despite their national repudiation is so unscrupulous and unserious that their main witness at a recent hearing was actress Alyssa Milano, who said they have an “obligation to fix the Constitution” and “stop it from failing” everyone “who is not a cisgender man.”
Oh wonderful. What is it with the Left constantly trying to change language and perceptions of reality?
I guess they figure it's only through tortured logic that they can ultimately coerce enough of the citizenry into buying the repugnant authoritarian agenda they're selling.
But hey, with the likes of Uber-Karen Alyssa Milano on board, what could possible go wrong??
Doesn't she/they realize that there are amendments to the Constitution that grants Rights to everyone?
For example the 13th amendment freed the slaves. She should be more concerned with helping the People to wisely use that Freedom instead of making excuses for their poor behavior.
There is a seat at the table of America for everyone and all we ask is you follow the rules yet the Democrats of late are trying their best to rewrite them.
Doesn't she/they realize that there are amendments to the Constitution that grants Rights to everyone?
For example the 13th amendment freed the slaves. She should be more concerned with helping the People to wisely use that Freedom instead of making excuses for their poor behavior.
There is a seat at the table of America for everyone and all we ask is you follow the rules yet the Democrats of late are trying their best to rewrite them.
And so much for them being the Party of "Women's Rights."
Now they want to let biological men into their bathrooms and let the same dudes beat them in sports.
So no more trophies for women, sounds equitable to me!
ok, blah blah blah. Its still an amendment. It has to pass congress by a wide margin - which it wont. it has to be ratified by 38 states, which it wont.
ok, blah blah blah. Its still an amendment. It has to pass congress by a wide margin - which it wont. it has to be ratified by 38 states, which it wont.
From your lips to God's ears.
However, you can judge political parties - just like people - by what motivates them.
And what motivates the Democrats at this point is sheer Un-American lunacy.
I mean, who goes into a voting booth thinking "Well, I'll vote for this Party because they can't possibly force their horrible agenda through".
Yet there are those that do and do not acknowledge that they are complicit in things they say they do not support yet by their vote are supporting.
Yeah, they're called Democrats! haha
I used to be one, and it sucks when I hang out with my old blue pilled friends and they think I've gone nuts. But when you try to tell them about what's actually happening, they don't want to hear it.
My Mother in Law literally said just yesterday "I don't want to know the facts!"
ok, blah blah blah. Its still an amendment. It has to pass congress by a wide margin - which it wont. it has to be ratified by 38 states, which it wont.
Actually you're wrong, the Dems tried to sue their way into burning the Constitution:
Quote:
The Democrats tried to sue the ERA into the Constitution and lost again. In March, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, ruled that a “ratification deadline in a proposing resolution’s introduction is just as effective as one in the text of a proposed amendment,” so the deadline to adopt the ERA “expired long ago.” He didn’t address whether a state can rescind its support of an amendment. The three states that ratified the ERA after the deadline appealed his decision in May. But even the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg seemed to reject their arguments. “How can you disregard states that said ‘we’ve changed our minds’?” she asked in 2020. “I would like to see a new beginning” for the ERA’s ratification, starting from scratch, she said.
I used to be one, and it sucks when I hang out with my old blue pilled friends and they think I've gone nuts. But when you try to tell them about what's actually happening, they don't want to hear it.
My Mother in Law literally said just yesterday "I don't want to know the facts!"
Commie crazy.
I have to live with my own Mother saying, "but they said it on NBC".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
