Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Identities of juries are never exposed unless they choose to do so. How do you know she is the only one that has a bias, did you read through all the social media accounts of the other jurors.
He's saying that the lawyers weren't allowed to know the jurors' identities, not that the public wasn't. And of course most of them were biased.Most of them depend on the USG for their livelihood (either directly or through a close family member), whether it's in the form of salaries or welfare benefits. The trial was in DC, for God's sake.
Says a lot about you that you want that old man to die in prison for doing nothing wrong.
Stone is a swamp creature of Washington that has made a livelihood for decades out of being an unscrupulous political operative. He deserves to die in prison.
Are you suggesting that the judge would or should use her power to settle personal scores?
When a judge places a gag order and the defendant not only violates the gag order but threatens the judge on social media that would be a consideration in sentencing.
No, it fits with what we know, but I'd like to see his source so I can share it with you.
The jury questionnaires were redacted on PACER to keep the jurors’ identities from the public. The attorneys involved have unredacted access, so no, their identities were not “hidden” from them. You honestly have no clue how any of this works, eh?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.