Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For some reason you refuse to respond to my request that you support your claim that the whistleblower or Vindman leaked the President's conversation to the press.
Given the moles in the government, eager to be the next whistle-blower, maybe it's not a bad idea. Why can't they just review the transcript afterward?
You mean doctored ones? Really? Can he do no wrong? Is Trump perfect? No? Look he is not a king nor a dictator. He works for we the people and is far to secretive as it is. There is no way that he should be allowed to talk to anyone in private. Lets not forget day one in the oval office with the Russian's and zero American press present when he gave away classified information to a geopolitical adversary.
No, I think this is a very short-sighted and untenable idea on many levels, BUT I do understand why he has a valid, non-nefarious reason for wanting to do it. What he needs to do instead is find a very limited pool, like no more than a handful, of trusted personnel to be transcribers.
like the anonymous claim he blasted Boris Johnson. maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. but why would somebody leak it to the press?
When you're President you call the shots. He can have as many or as few as he wishes, Dems should find a credible candidate, win an election, and try it sometime, remember, elections have consequences.
When you're President you call the shots. He can have as many or as few as he wishes, Dems should find a credible candidate, win an election, and try it sometime, remember, elections have consequences.
He's not a king. He's not entitled to behave like a king. He is a President, and that means he is subject to the oversight of the other branches of government. Checks and balances.
Well, needless to say, Don the Con can't run the government by himself. The more information he hides from his staff, the more difficult it will become to implement his policy. He's already painted himself into a corner, and now that corner is getting smaller.
Given the moles in the government, eager to be the next whistle-blower, maybe it's not a bad idea. Why can't they just review the transcript afterward?
Who is going to prepare the transcript if nobody is listening?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
