Virginia Gun Confisction Bill Fails (brainwash, felons, felony, states)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What's the downside of temporarily separating someone from his gun because he might have mental issues, do you not want to address the problem.
The way the laws are written they circumvent due process...….. This was done by design. If you want to take someone's firearms then charge them with a crime. But then you have to give them their rights, which means representation, and the right to face their accuser, the right to pursue damages for false accusation and a list of other things which are inconvenient to the people that want these laws on the books.
What's the downside of temporarily separating someone from his gun because he might have mental issues, do you not want to address the problem.
This is America...this is NOT the way to go about addressing the problem...and did you happen to notice, the article stated 'law enforcement' would be the ones who carry out the 'temporary confiscation'!! (need I say more? LOL)
The democrats realized that if they were to pass this and sign it into law it would precipitate a court case that would get to the Supreme Court and result in a ruling that "assault weapons" are in common use for legal purposes and therefore protected by the second amendment. Such a ruling from the S.C. would invalidate all assault weapons bans in existence and make similar future legislation extremely difficult.
"a court case that would get to the Supreme Court and result in a ruling that "assault weapons" are in common use for legal purposes and therefore protected by the second amendment."
How about "the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS shall NOT be INFRINGED"?
Last edited by Quick Enough; 02-19-2020 at 05:48 AM..
How do any States and Cities get away with passing laws that are clearly UNREASONABLE infringements on the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? Our court system is corrupt as Hell.
"How do any States and Cities get away with passing laws that are clearly UNREASONABLE infringements on the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?"
You really DON'T KNOW?
Look at where these laws come from, mostly DEM controlled states and cities.
The higher courts have been controlled by DEM appointed judges, INCLUDING the Supreme Court until recently. Why do you think the left has run to the 9th Circuit Court so often?
Why bother trying to fight these UNconstitutional laws when you know even if you go all the way to the Supreme Court you will lose?
NOW the tide has turned, and I my OPINION, we will see MORE challenges to these illegal gun laws. Especially when ginsbug is gone, then SC and Trump get another constitutionalist judge on the court.
The bill banned silencers and magazines over 12 and certain assault 2weapons, I assume it was the definition of what type of weapons would be banned. The other red flag laws passed. Hopefully this will return next year.
My God, people like you still don't get it. There will be no "assault weapon" ban. It's symbolic. I almost hope it passes to prove to people LIKE YOU it doesn't bar people from buying them. California already has this stupid "ban".
It's almost like washing the crash test dummies smashing into a wall at high speed over and over.
What's the downside of temporarily separating someone from his gun because he might have mental issues, do you not want to address the problem.
Do you know what happens to the firearm after the confiscation ? Ill tell you....All the firearms are taken .If the victim of this event has say 5 guns. they are sent to a Bonded Wearhouse, where a charge of approximately $ 25 per gun per day is charged ..So that's $125 a day every day until the Victim is released and allowed to retrieve the guns. This may take months. Also the Bonded Wearhouse is usually run by former cops. Nice way to bankrupt a innocent person who has never been guilty of a crime and keep the system of having to prove your innocence in court .
Do you know what happens to the firearm after the confiscation ? Ill tell you....All the firearms are taken .If the victim of this event has say 5 guns. they are sent to a Bonded Wearhouse, where a charge of approximately $ 25 per gun per day is charged ..So that's $125 a day every day until the Victim is released and allowed to retrieve the guns. This may take months. Also the Bonded Wearhouse is usually run by former cops. Nice way to bankrupt a innocent person who has never been guilty of a crime and keep the system of having to prove your innocence in court .
Thanks, good point. Any response from our Lefty friends here that don't seem to comprehend the downside of their Master's House gun Bills?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
