Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian
The Porkulus Act of 2009 not only had nothing to do with the economic rebound from 2008's Great Recession, it actually slowed the pace at which that recovery occurred.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1
It was a Public and Private UNION payback scheme as well as payback to other cronies that donated to his campaign. It slowed the recovery. The Federal Reserve is responsible for any "recovery", not Obama.
|
The 2009 ARRA did the follwoing,
- Gave American workers $237 billion dollars in tax cuts.
- Gave "$17 billion for one-time $300 payments to recipients of Supplemental Security Income and Social Security, and veterans receiving disability and pensions."
- Spent "$46 billion for transportation projects, including $27 billion for highway and bridge construction and repair and $11.5 billion for mass transit and rail projects," ex.ex.
- Gave "$15 billion to allow companies to use current losses to offset profits made in the previous five years, instead of two, making them eligible for tax refunds."
- Gave "$5 billion to extend a provision allowing businesses buying equipment such as computers to speed up its depreciation through 2009."
- Gave "$3.5 billion in grants to state and local law enforcement to hire officers and purchase equipment."
- Gave "$13 billion to extend tax credits for renewable energy production."
- Gave "$36 billion to subsidize locally issued bonds for school construction, teacher training, economic development and infrastructure improvements."
Can you explain how the above acts slowed the economic recovery?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americ...nt_Act_of_2009