Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2020, 12:24 PM
 
22,332 posts, read 11,861,882 times
Reputation: 20156

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritone View Post
No, that was long before there was a notion of a "hispanic" minority group. Your father was NOT a minority.
He most certainly was a minority. As a Hispanic, he was a mix of white, black and Native American Indian. IOW, he was dark complected and suffered discrimination due to that. When he looked for a part-time job as a teen, he would show up for an interview only to hear "We don't hire Puerto Ricans." Yes, the term "Hispanic" had yet to be coined but what does that matter? He was still a minority and still experienced blatant discrimination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2020, 01:25 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,042,185 times
Reputation: 3884
Amen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
1. Neanderthals were smarter than modern humans.
2. There is no statistical appearance of overreach by the administration. There is a statistical appearance of overreach by the district courts, which have continually purported to impose nationwide injunctions that necessitate an immediate appeal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 01:26 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,042,185 times
Reputation: 3884
Apparently, not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by unfailing presence View Post
Is there no limit to Trump Derangement Syndrome ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2020, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,549 posts, read 18,034,734 times
Reputation: 34333
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
The Supreme Court has to. That's it's job. Nationwide injunctions are almost always improper.
Yep. And its been striking the extent that "resistance" judges have gone to in order to issue such nationwide injunctions. Its much higher under President Trump than in the past.

Note, it would be one thing (but still a stretch) if these courts' orders were ultimately being upheld on the merits. But they have been largely struck down and invalidated by the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2020, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,009 posts, read 25,978,952 times
Reputation: 15504
This hyper partisanship that was generated by the Federalist Society and Mitch McConnell is bad for the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2020, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,493 posts, read 20,860,187 times
Reputation: 14174
It’s all going to make mrT king. Watch and see ~ but it won’t be the Dems who cause America to lose its democracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 04:16 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,729 posts, read 44,535,751 times
Reputation: 13600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
This hyper partisanship that was generated by the Federalist Society and Mitch McConnell is bad for the country.
Oh, BS. SCOTUS has been highly partisan for decades. Besides Sotomayor, do RBG, Breyer, and Kagan ring a bell? They're as partisan as it gets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 04:22 AM
 
15,068 posts, read 6,137,807 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
He most certainly was a minority. As a Hispanic, he was a mix of white, black and Native American Indian. IOW, he was dark complected and suffered discrimination due to that. When he looked for a part-time job as a teen, he would show up for an interview only to hear "We don't hire Puerto Ricans." Yes, the term "Hispanic" had yet to be coined but what does that matter? He was still a minority and still experienced blatant discrimination.
So basically he was able to pass at times when scores of others could not. He was able to get into college and have a successful career when others could not. Brown v Board of Education didn’t effect him someone like him because he was white enough to pass in many instances. He wouldn’t need affirmative action because he often wouldn’t be rejected for his race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,549 posts, read 18,034,734 times
Reputation: 34333
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
So basically he was able to pass at times when scores of others could not. He was able to get into college and have a successful career when others could not. Brown v Board of Education didn’t effect him someone like him because he was white enough to pass in many instances. He wouldn’t need affirmative action because he often wouldn’t be rejected for his race.
I am literally scratching my head about how you could have read BOS2IAD's statement and reached the conclusion that you did
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 05:06 AM
 
Location: Heart of the desert lands
3,976 posts, read 1,978,207 times
Reputation: 5219
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Her comments has nothing to do with one's political leanings and everything to do with the current administration statistically appearing to overreach with its position of what constitutes a true emergency requiring interlocutory relief at the Supreme Court level.

Apparently, this is now the 24th time that the Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to put a lower court decision on hold in less than three years compared to a total of eight such requests during the 16 years of the George W. Bush and Obama administration's combined. Sotomayor's dissent - if you bother to read it - is really aimed at addressing that issue.

But I know that facts and analysis will take a back seat to neanderthals bashing liberal judges. So do carry on.
Meh. She is the weakest and most partisan of the SC justices.

Why have so many "emergency" relief cases have been lofted?

I have read elsewhere that it is 55 in Trump's last 3 years, vice 19 for Obama's 8 years and 12 for W Bush's 8 years. Many of the courts that bring these have a known left bias, more than a 3rd coming out of California's notorious courts alone.

Ted Cruz put it best. Sotomayors complaining about her fellow SC justices is like an arsonist complaining about the sound of fire trucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top