Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-26-2020, 01:33 PM
 
171 posts, read 109,457 times
Reputation: 187

Advertisements

If this thread is an attempt to compare tRump vs Obama this ashamed republican would vote for Obama's dog over the nitwit in office now....and I did not vote for Obama either time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2020, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn New York
18,471 posts, read 31,643,914 times
Reputation: 28012
THE ONLY THING THAT OBAMA DID THAT I KNOW OF WAS SIGN THE "PACT ACT", which meant you were not able to mail any type of tobacco thru the mail, thus the indian reservations that sold cigartes were no longer able to do that, and if you were a smoker you then had to get cigs from a store near by, thus having to pay the full tax.


thats all i know of, and im not even a smoker, i just remember some of my collegues compaining of this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 02:44 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,677,065 times
Reputation: 21999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
I will even give you that he did ACA (even though HE didn't do any of the actual work on on it). And he was there when Osama was killed. But other than THAT, what did he actually do? Other than hobknob with Hollywood elites?
Please keep in mind that the ACA was an amazing accomplishment, something that other presidents tried to do for decades.

Then here are some items, better than anything we could come up with on our own.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazi...nts-revisited/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 02:52 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,235,353 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post

As the world financial system implodes, Democrats have blamed the Bush administration's lack of regulation for creating the conditions for collapse. But a top Clinton regulator acknowledges that he and his colleagues a decade ago "beat back" regulatory efforts that could have prevented credit markets from becoming so precariously balanced they were a millisecond from disaster.


The nation's leading financial officials – Levitt, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin, and his deputy Lawrence Summers – pummeled the proposal, saying it was dangerous to even discuss the idea. Led by Rubin, Levitt and Greenspan, the Clinton White House instead proposed a modest set of reforms. Months later, Clinton Administration officials walked away from their own recommendations, concluding the market could be best managed by the financial industry.

https://www.propublica.org/article/f...lame-for-marke




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2ibBMWU5Ew



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3ooMrgXido



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOP8mMSXYJQ





That guy balanced the budget, had a surplus, and a booming economy.


Yet another Democratic president who had to fix the mess created by the Republicans.


.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 03:00 PM
 
13,961 posts, read 5,628,343 times
Reputation: 8618
Off the top of my head, just in foreign policy, since that is primarily Executive and very little legislative:
  • He engineered the coup of Yanukovych in Ukraine.
  • He engineered the ouster of Qaddafi and provided most of the military resources to turn Libya into the Wild West.
  • He not only capitulated to Sisi in Egypt, he gave him cash and arms as well.
  • He is the primary reason the US is currently involved with Syria
  • He had his DoJ run arms to Mexican cartels, apparently for the sole purpose of getting US border agents killed to drum up support for ant-gun policies.
  • And he campaigned on "winning Afghanistan" and well, we all know where that one went.
Oh yeah, and he used drones to murder several Americans, including children. So there's that also.

Not that Orange Jesus is even one ounce better than Black Jesus, but His Eminence, the High Exalted Barack The First was a foreign policy f***up waiting to happen, as well as a pretty solid murderer of people around the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
Off the top of my head, just in foreign policy, since that is primarily Executive and very little legislative:
  • He engineered the coup of Yanukovych in Ukraine.
  • He engineered the ouster of Qaddafi and provided most of the military resources to turn Libya into the Wild West.
  • He not only capitulated to Sisi in Egypt, he gave him cash and arms as well.
  • He is the primary reason the US is currently involved with Syria
  • He had his DoJ run arms to Mexican cartels, apparently for the sole purpose of getting US border agents killed to drum up support for ant-gun policies.
  • And he campaigned on "winning Afghanistan" and well, we all know where that one went.
Oh yeah, and he used drones to murder several Americans, including children. So there's that also.

Not that Orange Jesus is even one ounce better than Black Jesus, but His Eminence, the High Exalted Barack The First was a foreign policy f***up waiting to happen, as well as a pretty solid murderer of people around the world.
The Ukraine coup later became the impetus of the fake Trump impeachment hearings. Not that few folks here or in the MSM put that one together.

It's important to note that Obama killed American citizens without due process. When that 16-year-old kid in Yemen was eviscerated by Mr. Hope and Change's drone he had not been charged with a crime nor was he even under investigation for any crime.

If the President of the United States had ordered a drone strike that "collaterally damaged" an American citizen sitting at a cafe in Iowa as opposed to Yemen folks would be up in arms over it.

Well, half would be. These folks just follow their team til death do they part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Boulder, CO
2,066 posts, read 901,317 times
Reputation: 3489
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Reading from a teleprompter while overseeing the weakest recovery from recession in US history is not an accomplishment.

He did make some pretty good sweet sixteen bracket picks a few times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 05:02 PM
 
Location: A coal patch in Pennsyltucky
10,379 posts, read 10,667,875 times
Reputation: 12705
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
He only rescued our economy from the Republican orchestrated disaster. And every step of the way, legions of right-wingers were screaming at him to implement austerity, while Obama wisely ignored their foolishness and went the direction of Keynesian.

Imagine what US would be like today if we had listened to the fools, er conservatives, and implement..... austerity (!!!!!!!). We'd be exactly where Europe is now with huge unemployment and repeated recession.

.



Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
He acted like he had some damn sense and NEVER once brought disgrace upon the presidency. He was able to walk out of the job with his head held high.

And that’s for starters, which is a lot better than what this present occupant of the WH will be able to do when he’s done.

Exactly! He made me proud to be an American.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Still not seeing much. If you give Obama credit for that tepid recovery, I wonder what you think of how the economy is NOW?

And as far as the Recession being caused by the GOP, that's just simple minded thinking. How about Clinton and Barney Frank's everyone needs to own a home contribution or the repeal of Glass Steagall? Maybe some simple minded people still buy the nonsense that it was all on the GOP, but anyone who can think critically knows there was more to it than that.

Check the actual data. The current economy is a continuatation of what started under Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 05:12 PM
 
30,434 posts, read 21,271,177 times
Reputation: 11989
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
That guy balanced the budget, had a surplus, and a booming economy.


Yet another Democratic president who had to fix the mess created by the Republicans.


.
Bush 1 left him a mess jess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2020, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post

As the world financial system implodes, Democrats have blamed the Bush administration's lack of regulation for creating the conditions for collapse. But a top Clinton regulator acknowledges that he and his colleagues a decade ago "beat back" regulatory efforts that could have prevented credit markets from becoming so precariously balanced they were a millisecond from disaster.


The nation's leading financial officials – Levitt, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin, and his deputy Lawrence Summers – pummeled the proposal, saying it was dangerous to even discuss the idea. Led by Rubin, Levitt and Greenspan, the Clinton White House instead proposed a modest set of reforms. Months later, Clinton Administration officials walked away from their own recommendations, concluding the market could be best managed by the financial industry.

https://www.propublica.org/article/f...lame-for-marke




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2ibBMWU5Ew



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3ooMrgXido



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOP8mMSXYJQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
That guy balanced the budget, had a surplus, and a booming economy.


Yet another Democratic president who had to fix the mess created by the Republicans.


.


Point and grunt if you like, but actions have consequences.

In the case of Bill Clinton, NAFTA and the 2000 China Trade Act gutted the industries that mortgage payers relied on for their income.

Large numbers of home owners seeing their jobs shipped to low wage nations created a high rate of mortgage default.

Since derivatives were never regulated, and since they were primarily backed with bundled mortgages, over-leveraging of the derivatives created the financial house of cards that came crashing down in the fall of 2008.

If Bill Clinton is never president, there is no 2008 financial crisis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top