Court rules Trump can withhold funds from 'sanctuary' jurisdictions (interstate, drugs, crime)

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

It is not an excuse, it is a fact: There is no law which mandates local LE to enforce Federal laws. Period.

I am not seeking your agreement, I am merely stating a fact.

Local LE can choose to enforce Federal laws, and many/most WOULD, if the Feds helped with the expense.

Local LE would choose to enforce/assist fed LE to enforce fed law, but sanctuary state law PROHIBITED them from doing that. At least here in California.

Also, 287(g) program is funded by ICE, including bed space.

Ask me how i know all that.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

Local LE would choose to enforce/assist fed LE to enforce fed law, but sanctuary state law PROHIBITED them from doing that. At least here in California.

Also, 287(g) program is funded by ICE, including bed space.

Ask me how i know all that.

Exactly! And thank you for your service to our country!

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by FatBob96

That's what Democrats do.

Democrats don't want funding to help enforcement.....if they did they would ask for it.
They want funding for everything BUT enforcement.

And if you are supporting them, you are DEFACTO supporting that POV.

Pretending that this is about funding is ridiculous and isn't fooling anyone.

Fat Bob,

Either you are unable to comprehend simple language, or you are just being deliberately dishonest.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by 4dognight

What possesses you to believe that any funding provided for law breaking politicians, who are putting criminals back out onto the street over and over, will somehow be used for legal purposes?

No, I saw it. You are saying there is no point in funding law enforcement, which is the same as trying to wish the problem away.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer

I was against illegal immigration at least since the 1990s when it really took off.

Actually it peaked in the 80s, and its down about 75% since then.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by 4dognight

Exactly. I support the enforcement of US immigration laws by whomever has the balls to do it.

You'll have to do it yourself since you oppose funding the effort.

[FatBob96]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

Fat Bob,

Either you are unable to comprehend simple language, or you are just being deliberately dishonest.

Has Miami asked for federal assistance with immigration enforcement?


You're individual opinion on the matter is irrelevant.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

Also, 287(g) program is funded by ICE, including bed space.

Out of 15 000+ police sheriff offices in US, less than 40 participated in that program, cost being the main reason. Funded? LOL

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by FatBob96

Has Miami asked for federal assistance with immigration enforcement? You're individual opinion on the matter is irrelevant.

Why waste time asking questions, when you preemptively judge the answers irrelevant?

Arguing for the sake of arguing........the hallmark of a Trump loyalist.

[boxus]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

It is not an excuse, it is a fact: There is no law which mandates local LE to enforce Federal laws. Period.

I am not seeking your agreement, I am merely stating a fact.

Local LE can choose to enforce Federal laws, and many/most WOULD, if the Feds helped with the expense.

Be a US citizen or lawful resident, and see just how fast local LE assists when you break federal law. I will give you a hint, it is full cooperation, no questions asked other than "what can I do to help".

Be a deserter from the military, FBI most wanted, etc. Full cooperation on child crime, cyber crimes, and working with the US Marshall in apprehending fugitives, etc.