Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The real problem no one wants to talk about is the employers that absolutely love these illegal immigrants...they are cheap labor and not required to pay them even the minimum wage.
Im assuming these large companies and industries will put pressure on Trump to 'ease up' on their work force! (its going to cost them millions if they have hire legal US citizens).
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him? The guy was already impeached for abuse of power.
Are you kidding me?! He is taking action against those cities who are working to protect criminal aliens. WHY oh WHY are leftists intent on defending those who break our laws? Do you really place the interests of lowlife illegal aliens who cause harm to Americans above Americans themselves?
The real problem no one wants to talk about is the employers that absolutely love these illegal immigrants...they are cheap labor and not required to pay them even the minimum wage.
I'm assuming these large companies and industries will put pressure on Trump to 'ease up' on their work force! (its going to cost them millions if they have hire legal US citizens).
More of the problem comes from Democrats who see illegal aliens as:
1) future Democrats - either by giving them a "path to citizenship" (thus rewarding illegal behavior) or later, from their anchor babies.
2) a way to tip Congress more toward Democrats, as the population in any given state (like California, where they settle) is what determines how many districts that state gets.
The real problem no one wants to talk about is the employers that absolutely love these illegal immigrants...they are cheap labor and not required to pay them even the minimum wage.
Im assuming these large companies and industries will put pressure on Trump to 'ease up' on their work force! (its going to cost them millions if they have hire legal US citizens).
Yes. Go after the employers who hire them and they'll have less incentive to come here in the first place. This is an "as well as" kind of solution though, not an "instead of" kind. It is also something that unfortunately neither party seems willing to act on in any major way, although lip service is easy enough to find. Trump has been a little bit better than his predecessors on this, but not by enough.
The real problem no one wants to talk about is the employers that absolutely love these illegal immigrants...they are cheap labor and not required to pay them even the minimum wage.
Im assuming these large companies and industries will put pressure on Trump to 'ease up' on their work force! (its going to cost them millions if they have hire legal US citizens).
Huh? We law abiding Americans constantly state that we want e-verify mandated to stop the employers from hiring illegal aliens and severe punishment for those who "knowingly" hire them. We also want the illegals deported as they are equally guilty of breaking the law. The pro-illegals constantly demand the same but yet they don't want the illegals to be held accountable at all and in fact rewarded with another amnesty.
The employers used to be just fine hiring citizens before millions of illegal aliens flooded our border and they would be just fine again. They would still make a profit but just not on the greedy level as they have been.
Yes. Go after the employers who hire them and they'll have less incentive to come here in the first place. This is an "as well as" kind of solution though, not an "instead of" kind. It is also something that unfortunately neither party seems willing to act on in any major way, although lip service is easy enough to find. Trump has been a little bit better than his predecessors on this, but not by enough.
FYI, the GOP has presented more than one e-verify bill but the Democrats won't pass it without another amnesty. It is they that are the culprits.
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him? The guy was already impeached for abuse of power.
POTUS is only president of those states that voted for him. He's made that clear.
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him? The guy was already impeached for abuse of power.
hahahahahahaha. BS. These cities are breaking the law. It's that simple.
Originally Posted by rjshae
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him? The guy was already impeached for abuse of power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncguy50
hahahahahahaha. BS. These cities are breaking the law. It's that simple.
BS on steroids is more like it. Individual city officials are breaking the law, committing crimes. They are being dealt with appropriately. It just angers the leftists who don't get their way.
BS on steroids is more like it. Individual city officials are breaking the law, committing crimes. They are being dealt with appropriately. It just angers the leftists who don't get their way.
Don't be daft. Individual city officials are not "breaking the law." You either have a profound misunderstanding of what a "sanctuary city" is or a profound misunderstanding of the law. Or both.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
