Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Long Island
56,930 posts, read 25,873,676 times
Reputation: 15458

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
That's a lie. He hasn't found anything.
So you’re going to ignore the judges comments.

 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,831 posts, read 21,927,834 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Looks like Barr is going to get slapped around a bit. This is highly unusual. Of course everything has been highly unusual since we've had Cheeto Jesus.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...judge-s-review

No comment from Barr.
So the US AG in the future will need to pass around classified documents to federal judges to get a consensus on what to redact? Swell.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,831 posts, read 21,927,834 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
uhm.. that judge has zero jurisdiction for that
Maybe the judge is a "wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences , and could more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life"
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:40 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,753,952 times
Reputation: 11328
The Mueller report was never the "nothingburger" that Trump supporters insist it was.

It's just we are living in an era where anything is excusable for the POTUS as long as they appoint anti-gay and anti-abortion judges.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:44 AM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,677 posts, read 6,386,515 times
Reputation: 13154
An independent validation of the redacted content will be most welcome. If nothing else it will help settle any lingering doubts (which I most definitely still have).
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:57 AM
 
18,527 posts, read 7,284,258 times
Reputation: 11327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
So you’re going to ignore the judges comments.
I read the judge's opinion. Did you?
 
Old 03-06-2020, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island
56,930 posts, read 25,873,676 times
Reputation: 15458
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
I read the judge's opinion. Did you?
You stated he didn’t find anything.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 01:55 PM
 
Location: El paso,tx
4,513 posts, read 2,497,929 times
Reputation: 8199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That is fairly laughable, hopefully you have more than the MSM is unfair. The judge reviewed the redacted portion of the Mueller report because of a Freedom of Information Act request and found Barr's rapid response with his version to be partisan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/05/u...ge-walton.html
The judge DID NOT review redacted portion. There has been no declassification of the redacted portions.

This is just a partisan judge still trying to smear Trump and Barr.

The FACT that the whole investigation was based on fraudulent FISA warrants, renders the mueller investigation a farce.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 02:03 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,552,236 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spottednikes View Post
The judge DID NOT review redacted portion. There has been no declassification of the redacted portions.

This is just a partisan judge still trying to smear Trump and Barr.

The FACT that the whole investigation was based on fraudulent FISA warrants, renders the mueller investigation a farce.
I love it when a post plays all of the Greatest Hits. This one really ticks all of the boxes.

Fake news! Anti-Trump bias! Trump's a victim! So unfair! Deep State!

And I love how you threw in a word in all caps, included a few grammar/punctuation errors, and made sure to include at least one non sequitur for authenticity.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 02:12 PM
 
Location: El paso,tx
4,513 posts, read 2,497,929 times
Reputation: 8199
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
I love it when a post plays all of the Greatest Hits. This one really ticks all of the boxes.

Fake news! Anti-Trump bias! Trump's a victim! So unfair! Deep State!

And I love how you threw in a word in all caps, included a few grammar/punctuation errors, and made sure to include at least one non sequitur for authenticity.
And I love TDS inspired posts like yours.
The redacted sections of the report have not been declassified. The judge does not possess the security clearance needed to review the redacted portions. He has not reviewed the redacted portions.
It's a fact that 2 of the FISA warrants were determined to be falsified. It's a fact that the FBI knew before starting the Meuller investigation that the Steele dossier was unverified. The wording at the top of FISA warrants state that the information contained within is verified. Therefore the FBI lied on ALL FISA warrants.
Why don't you post your proof that these facts are incorrect?...Oh...I know...because you don't have any.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top