Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It wasn't a "bogus" case.This is the problem when you get all your information from Trump on Twitter you should try reading a real news article with the details. This case was going to be difficult since the companies are in Russia, large downside and most likely failing.
Quote:
Unlike the others under indictment, Concord fought the charges in court. But instead of trying to defend itself, Concord seized on the case to obtain confidential information from prosecutors, then mount a campaign of information warfare, a senior Justice Department official said. At one point, prosecutors complained that a cache of documents that could potentially be shared with the defendants included details about the government’s sources and methods for investigation, among its most important secrets. Prosecutors feared Concord might publish them online.
With the case set to go to trial next month, prosecutors recommended that the Justice Department drop the charges to preserve national security interests and prevent Russia from weaponizing delicate American law enforcement information, according to the official. The prosecutors also weighed the benefits of securing a guilty verdict against the companies, which cannot be meaningfully punished in the United States, against the risk of exposing national security secrets in order to win in court.
Next thing they should do is drop the Bogus case against Gen Flynn. It's false and gone on way to long.
Why would they drop it, he already pled guilty awaiting sentencing. Besides, not to worry Trump will pardon him as is the case with all his trusted inner circle of felons.
It wasn't a "bogus" case.This is the problem when you get all your information from Trump on Twitter you should try reading a real news article with the details. This case was going to be difficult since the companies are in Russia, large downside and most likely failing.
If it wasn't a bogus case, they would go ahead to trial, and prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why do you think the Russian company called Mueller's bluff?
Mueller had no case, that has been obvious from the very beginning.
It wasn't a "bogus" case.This is the problem when you get all your information from Trump on Twitter you should try reading a real news article with the details. This case was going to be difficult since the companies are in Russia, large downside and most likely failing.
The problem with your theory is the defendants actually came to the US to answer the charges. And when they did, the DOJ had no response. Well, that's not quite true, they asked the presiding judge for more time to prepare the charges, to which the judge responded "don't issue indictments for defendants you're not prepared to charge."
In short, by showing up to answer to the charges which the DOJ never expected they'd do, they exposed the charges as window dressing to make the Muller probe look more important and substantive than it really was.
The problem with your theory is the defendants actually came to the US to answer the charges. And when they did, the DOJ had no response. Well, that's not quite true, they asked the presiding judge for more time to prepare the charges, to which the judge responded "don't issue indictments for defendants you're not prepared to charge."
In short, by showing up to answer to the charges which the DOJ never expected they'd do, they exposed the charges as window dressing to make the Muller probe look more important and substantive than it really was.
Yes, even pundits from CNN when the indictments were unsealed, said that Mueller may have made a mistake indicting a company that may show up in court to fight the charges.
Mueller's 30+ million dollar investigation netted exactly 0 convictions for election interference.
The only case Mueller brought to prove "Russian interference" with any defense is now being dismissed by DOJ b/c prosecutors knew they couldn't win at trial.
Repeat: the DOJ could not find a single case they could successfully prosecute to prove any act of "Russian interference."
What a complete and total sham that entire exercise was.
Fortunately US Attorney John Durham is investigating this failed coup attempt.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
