Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:28 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,909,762 times
Reputation: 6714

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
It's not the President's job to "instill hope" in a specific, unproven drug. Sorry, try again.
WOW ! Just WOW..! Ignorance personified.... A case of common sense being blinded by hate..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:28 AM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,466 posts, read 15,250,426 times
Reputation: 14336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
I am seeing more reports of injury from so called cytokine storm. After my wife's second stem cell transplant, the specialists felt this over exuberant immune response was trying to kill her in a multitude of ways.

There are some feasible medical suggestions that increased general immunity might be helpful today.
For instance BCG. Maybe the fact that I got BCG'd in med school saved me from a darker fate with my own covid 19 infection.

https://www.google.com/search?source...4dUDCAg&uact=5
I had just read about this last night. It is interesting to say the least. But it has to be kept in mind that the countries with mandatory BCG vaccination also tend to be the poorest countries, who have done the least testing.

Also, I am wondering, if the BCG vaccine does turn out to be protective, since it is a live vaccine, does that mean that anyone who is PPD positive has the same protection? It seems logical that they would, but that may be wishful thinking on my part because I turned PPD positive almost 30 years ago while in med school.

As to Cytokine Storm, yes. I have read reports that diabetics are more prone to this, and have been wondering if that is why our population on ventilators is notably, disproportionally diabetics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:31 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,503,704 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
It's not the President's job to "instill hope" in a specific, unproven drug. Sorry, try again.
Sorry, but it IS the president’s job to let Americans know that there is an existing drug that is showing some very favorable outcomes, based on significant anecdotal evidence. Are leftists really so scared that he might be associated with good news? It’s really horrible the way the liberal media is hyping all the negatives - and only the negatives. Things are bad enough without the anti-Trump cultists* downplaying glimmers of hope.

*I don’t like all the leftists calling people who don’t despise Trump “cult members,” but rather than continue to object to it, I figure I’d stop fighting them....and join them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:40 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man View Post
Take off the partisan blinders, calling it the Trump Drug was conjured up by those on the left as a way of mocking the great one. Unfortunately for them, the drug has become a game changer and now Trump will forever be remembered as, once again, saving America. Gotta hurt if your eyes are slanted towards the left... Remember this as you drift off to sleep tonight, TRUMP MAGA for four more years. You are very lucky...
No partisan blinders here.

As I said, I haven't seen it used outside of internet forums and when I have seen it used there, it has been exclusively Trump supporters, that I can recall.

If you or Rachel have some examples, that would be helpful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:45 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,909,762 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
No partisan blinders here.

As I said, I haven't seen it used outside of internet forums and when I have seen it used there, it has been exclusively Trump supporters, that I can recall.

If you or Rachel have some examples, that would be helpful.
This is page 126 of this tread. Go back to the fist page and read all 126, it was the left who coined the phrase to mock the current and next president of the USA. Lucky you....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:50 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10253
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnotherTouchOfWhimsy View Post
How is the drug risk free? It has some pretty significant risks, particularly when combined with azithromycin. Things like cardiac arrest and deadly heart rhythms. If it isn't proven or strongly suspected (by medical professionals, not a reality TV star) to work, then it's not "worth a try" because it is FAR from harmless.

That being said, if a medical doctor wants to prescribe it because they believe it will work, then they are absolutely free to do so. No doctor needs permission from the president to prescribe a drug off label.
a couple of points here.


if takin the prescribed dosage, there is a 65 year history of the safety of this medication. 65 years. The "book" on this drug is very clear. It is very safe. Doctors who have been using the medication say it is very safe.


It is easy to say that something isn't "risk free". Opening my front door carries some risk. But the actual data. the actual literature on this medication is very clear. It is one of the most well understood medications on the planet. It is possibly one of the most used medications as well. hundreds of millions of people have been prescribed this drug with billions of doses having been taken.


Anyone suggesting it is a dangerous drug should be viewed with complete skepticism. This is not reality. This is NOT what the SCIENCE says.


As for the efficacy of the medication, one can argue that there aren't enough double blind studies to suggest this medication is effective against COVID19. Clearly that is the case as we have had Covid19 for a very short few months. There hasn't been enough time to create studies then administer them over time to achieve an acceptable scientific conclusion.


Having said that, there is substantial evidence based on the Peer Review Record, that Hydroxy Chloroquine has clear anti-viral properties and has been used for that purpose for a number of years.


This Peer Review Record is that initially led doctors in China and then Europe to experiment with the drug in treating those with advanced COVID19 symptoms.


The results, while clearly not conclusive as stated above, has shown clear promise and those researchers who have been using it are reporting that a patient who has taken a 600 mg initial load, followed by a daily dose of 400mg daily for a total of 6 days are dramatically less likely to end up needing to be placed on ventilators.


There are multiple small studies. There is now a research paper (not double blind) covering 1000 patients in France. And its potential has researchers at the NIH doing further studies.


The doctors in the trenches around the world are saying it works. More importantly they are themselves taking the drug to prevent themselves from being infected. Scientists seem to be speaking loudly that this is a very good weapon in the fight against Covid19.


Worth a try? well the NIH (National Institute of Health) believes it is as they are conducting trails. in terms of drugs prescribed, it is the number one medication prescribed by doctors.


To address your last point, multiple states governors have issued executive orders banning this drug from being used by doctors to fight COVID19. So not all doctors can use it "off label".


This drug has become a political football because Donald Trump talked about it. Not because it is or isn't a valid option, but because people in this country have decided that anything Trump says must at all costs be used to attack him.


people will die because of this unfathomable attitude toward Mr. Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:52 AM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,558,130 times
Reputation: 4725
I cannot believe the anti-vaxx types are still at it... don't you realize that the only people you'll convince to refuse treatment are boomers on the left.... and that's basically the only people who support Biden.

You are letting your TDS cause a wave election for the president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,215,541 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem View Post
How would you like to get the placebo in such a study?
Now is not the time.
I'm sorry, but you're confused as to which side of the argument I'm on. Feel free to click on my username and look for posts I have made in this and other HCQ topics.

I've been talking about using it since before Trump did - I saw some Euro doc on TV around Mar 17 saying it was a possibility (and why - that it inhibited viral replication), and since it had been around so long with extremely low risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,215,541 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
I have only heard Trump supporters referring to it as the "Trump Drug".

we could do a google search, and I believe in the early days it was generally used by the left. I could be wrong though. I've never called it that, and disregarded all references to it. It's just my sense.

kind of like the "Trump economy" ... I don't attribute much in the stock market to him. Maybe <6 months after Nov 2016, because clearly Wall St preferred him to HRC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,215,541 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
..and yet, in malaria countries you can buy it off the shelf...OTC...pick it up, go to the cashier, pay for it, take it home

no doctor, no prescription...nada...just like aspirin

and they are not dropping off like flies

..it's sold OTC in Mexico as Aralen and Plaquenil
there was a report a week or so ago that some in African nation(s) had indeed screwed up and OD'd on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top