Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:31 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,129,736 times
Reputation: 11095

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by enraeh View Post
Welp, as your goddess Hillary once said “What difference at this point does it make?!?”

You can either light one candle or relive 2016. What difference will you make?
I don't have a goddess. I realize that many idolize the grifter in The White House but I am not in an insane category such as that and especially not one that is corporate owned.

Back on topic....coming from a background in surgery, where preparedness and timing is of the essence, the way this was handled was a depraved atrocity and at the feet of the so called executive branch and their lackeys.

Last edited by sickofnyc; 03-21-2020 at 03:12 PM..

 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by oping00 View Post
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...arned-pandemic


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...se/5064881002/

'Gross misjudgment': Experts say Trump's decision to disband pandemic team hindered coronavirus response


Dont suger coat it Trump a just a ******, realty TV show personally.


in January, Trump was closing off travel to/from china...and the fascist liberals kept saying "racist"






/end thread
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:45 PM
 
18,449 posts, read 8,275,501 times
Reputation: 13778
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
No WHO did not say it was not contiguous.

They said...

**********************************************
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China
**********************************************
May have been a lie or just incorrect but it was WHO passing on a finding by the Chinese. And even the finding is not definitive.
try again....that's exactly what they said...no clear evidence of human to human transmission

..that means not contagious....the word is contagious.....not contiguous
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:52 PM
 
18,449 posts, read 8,275,501 times
Reputation: 13778
Middle of Jan....no one had seen this outside of China..no one had anything to go on but what China said

China told the World Health Organization they had no evidence of human to human transmission...not contagious

on Jan 14....the WHO told that to the world...and the world acted accordingly..and that includes not just Trump but the entire world

China was lying their f'in a$$es off...trying to cover it up
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:53 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,129,736 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
Middle of Jan....no one had seen this outside of China..no one had anything to go on but what China said

China told the World Health Organization they had no evidence of human to human transmission...not contagious

on Jan 14....the WHO told that to the world...and the world acted accordingly..and that includes not just Trump but the entire world

China was lying their f'in a$$es off...trying to cover it up
So, China lying excuses Trump's lying? Does it also excuse the insider trading which ensued?

I was not aware that the USA was being governed by China.
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:56 PM
 
Location: The South
7,480 posts, read 6,260,559 times
Reputation: 13002
Quote:
Originally Posted by oping00 View Post
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...arned-pandemic


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...se/5064881002/

'Gross misjudgment': Experts say Trump's decision to disband pandemic team hindered coronavirus response


Dont suger coat it Trump a just a ******, realty TV show personally.
Well heck, just impeach him then.
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:58 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,129,736 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern man View Post
Well heck, just impeach him then.
He could be impeached multiple times but that is not good enough at this point.
 
Old 03-21-2020, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,350,196 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
try again....that's exactly what they said...no clear evidence of human to human transmission

..that means not contagious....the word is contagious.....not contiguous
I begin to think you are deliberately mis-comprehending what is clearly written...

It begins...
"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities"

That provides a source for the information. It is the Chinese authorities saying it.

And the message is "have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus". That simply denies they found evidence that it was contagious. Though note they changed that less than a month later to decide it was highly contagious.

I believe this was actually a battle going on in Chinese groups over what was actually true. Dumb in many ways as the truth was virtually certain to come out in the end.

And I suggest you park your biases a bit. Kind of slow to continue posting views directly contradicted by your cite.
 
Old 03-21-2020, 03:36 PM
 
13,511 posts, read 17,038,460 times
Reputation: 9691
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
No WHO did not say it was not contiguous.

They said...

**********************************************
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China
**********************************************
May have been a lie or just incorrect but it was WHO passing on a finding by the Chinese. And even the finding is not definitive.
Chances of right wing people on this forum not continuing to regurgitate their misinformation that the WHO said the virus was not contagious if after it has been summarily dismissed: ZERO
 
Old 03-21-2020, 03:37 PM
 
13,511 posts, read 17,038,460 times
Reputation: 9691
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
I begin to think you are deliberately mis-comprehending what is clearly written...

It begins...
"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities"

That provides a source for the information. It is the Chinese authorities saying it.

And the message is "have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus". That simply denies they found evidence that it was contagious. Though note they changed that less than a month later to decide it was highly contagious.

I believe this was actually a battle going on in Chinese groups over what was actually true. Dumb in many ways as the truth was virtually certain to come out in the end.

And I suggest you park your biases a bit. Kind of slow to continue posting views directly contradicted by your cite.


they'll just keep on saying it. Probably heard it on Mark Levine or something. Pathetic
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top