Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,404,194 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
It can't be Medicare for All, because Medicare does not control costs well enough. It will probably be a single payer system.
a true singlepayer...will cost 7+ trillion annually..and will be on the backs of the taxpayers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Born + raised SF Bay; Tyler, TX now WNY
8,354 posts, read 4,621,739 times
Reputation: 8243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
You've had 50 years to make your case. Time's up.
50 years? Ok then. Why can cash-only clinics function on a fraction of the cost? Billing to insurance is a big cost to a practitioner. Why do care providers routinely overprescribe diagnostics? Defensive Medicine and our lawsuit culture. Why are drug prices so high? We function as an ATM so everyone else gets better prices, which sucks but isn’t all bad.

Address these, please, before you put all these on the public dime. Our healthcare has dysfunctions NOT automatically solved by UHC.

Solve those prerequisites and I may not vote for it, but I’ll stand silent.

Don’t make me pay for the dumb parts of healthcare as I already am, but then put it in the hands of the famously incompetent DC bureaucrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:17 PM
 
Location: USA
18,451 posts, read 9,084,138 times
Reputation: 8490
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123 View Post
No reason to think it would get cheaper just because we adopted UHC. As per my previous post, there’s a lot of cost-cutting to be done before we should even think about this.
Cost cutting would certainly happen with UHC. Most countries with UHC spend a lower % of their GDP on healthcare compared to the USA.

We would be cutting out all of the “middle men” (the insurance companies) that add no actual value to the healthcare system. Reducing the amount of rent seeking in a society is always good. Naturally the rent seekers will do everything they can do to keep their racket going. They’ll bribe (contribute to the political campaigns of) as many politicians as they have to.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,545,277 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astral_Weeks View Post
You are presenting a stark choice as if it is your way or the highway.

We do need universal health care but if you look around the world there are about 60 countries that have guaranteed universal health care for their citizens, only a handful use a single-payer system, meaning there are plenty of methods besides single-payer.

Countries like Japan, Germany, South Korea, and Switzerland have very good universal healthcare models that are adaptable to the U.S. system, as they rely on a private-public hybrid insurance framework that the U.S. already uses.
No two countries deliver UHC the same way. The two characteristics they share are the individual mandate and subsidy for low/ no income people.

The Swiss, for example, rely entirely on private insurance, cradle to grave. Most hospitals are public.

Germany has the oldest healthcare system and mostly operate with public insurance with private insurance used to help pay for that which public insurance does not. Employers share in the cost of public insurance. Most hospitals are public.

South Korea operates with a Single Payer Model. Most hospitals and doctors are private.

And then there Japan’s Single Payer model layered on top of private hospitals and medical practices. Japan that embraces poly hospitals- very small highly specialized hospitals owned by doctors.

All these systems are in some stage of financial collapse, because of medical inflation and soaring costs and they do not experience anywhere near the violence that results in hospital admissions the US does.

Pharma is another aspect of healthcare costs. One of the ways these countries control these costs is simply not prescribing to the extent the US does, including formulations. Why prescribe 15 mg of ABC when it has been termined 10 mg has the same outcome in most patients. These countries are not as nearly beholden to Big Pharma as the US is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,404,194 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
Cost cutting would certainly happen with UHC. Most countries with UHC spend a lower % of their GDP on healthcare compared to the USA.

We would be cutting out all of the “middle men” (the insurance companies) that add no actual value to the healthcare system. Reducing the amount of rent seeking in a society is always good. Naturally the rent seekers will do everything they can do to keep their racket going. They’ll bribe (contribute to the political campaigns of) as many politicians as they have to.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking
you would be cutting the "insurance middleman" out but adding a government middleman


UHC will NOT cut costs, not one dime
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,545,277 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
a true singlepayer...will cost 7+ trillion annually..and will be on the backs of the taxpayers
I have no idea what Single Payer would cost. I do know we could bankrupt Jeff Bezos personal wealth and not make a dent in it.

Unless/ until US people take more personal responsibility for their own health, costs will not decline.
That 75% of us are overweight/ obese means most of us are substantially more vulnerable to otherwise preventable disease, one- third of the US population is Diabetic or pre- Diabetic. One- third !

High cholesterol,blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, some cancers and joint deterioration are all amplified by excess weight. And then we have the audacity to complain about healthcare costs.

Japan cut their obesity rate to 3.5%. Compare that to 40% in the US. Everyone must submit to an annual waist measure. Those with waist sizes greater than the healthy range are required to submit to counseling. Employers are required to do the measuring for employees. Employers are given annual goals to reduce waist sizes by x% or pay higher rates into the Sickness Fund.

The US could cover the entire cost of healthcare for right- sized households and save money. The rest could pay premiums on a sliding fee schedule based on surplus weight. This would need to include Medicare, Medicaid, VA/ tri are etc, too.

Provide the incentive to right size. Those who choose np not to eithnpay more or do without.What kind of healthcare system covers “ My 600 Pound Lifers” and charges premiums to those who make better choice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Denver
9,963 posts, read 18,452,204 times
Reputation: 6181
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage98de View Post
How much does a new, non-luxury midsize family car cost in either of those countries?

I eagerly await your response...
Taxes being your point? I'm fine with taxing more on cars to get healthcare. Hell maybe cars here are too cheap?

But anyhow I didn't need a car in neither Singapore nor Sydney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:43 PM
 
34,620 posts, read 21,496,037 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
BTW, I agree with the OP that this is the end of the line but for another reason.

Medical capacity has been cut in NYC since the early 2000s largely to control costs, which private entities have to do. If the government was running it, the number of doctors, hospital beds, etc, that are needed could be determined by scientists who advise public policy makers.
You're right about one think, private healthcare tries to control costs.

If you're middle-class, be prepared to see a large portion of your paycheck taken for national healthcare.

I hope you're ready to pay for the millions of illegals with chronic conditions to stream here to absorb your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:43 PM
 
8,726 posts, read 7,375,285 times
Reputation: 12612
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
I have no idea what Single Payer would cost. I do know we could bankrupt Jeff Bezos personal wealth and not make a dent in it.

Unless/ until US people take more personal responsibility for their own health, costs will not decline.
That 75% of us are overweight/ obese means most of us are substantially more vulnerable to otherwise preventable disease, one- third of the US population is Diabetic or pre- Diabetic. One- third !

High cholesterol,blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, some cancers and joint deterioration are all amplified by excess weight. And then we have the audacity to complain about healthcare costs.

Japan cut their obesity rate to 3.5%. Compare that to 40% in the US. Everyone must submit to an annual waist measure. Those with waist sizes greater than the healthy range are required to submit to counseling. Employers are required to do the measuring for employees. Employers are given annual goals to reduce waist sizes by x% or pay higher rates into the Sickness Fund.

The US could cover the entire cost of healthcare for right- sized households and save money. The rest could pay premiums on a sliding fee schedule based on surplus weight. This would need to include Medicare, Medicaid, VA/ tri are etc, too.

Provide the incentive to right size. Those who choose np not to eithnpay more or do without.What kind of healthcare system covers “ My 600 Pound Lifers” and charges premiums to those who make better choice?
Why waist measure and not body fat percent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:45 PM
 
3,275 posts, read 2,325,547 times
Reputation: 6733
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Billing costs for practices in part are so high because medical billing is a disastrous cluster****. Going to UHC would eliminate most of those problems and billing costs for practices would fall substantially. With UHC, you only have one billing standard, and you know the government is going to pay.
Yeah, and you will be treated by your govt worker doctor. Think of DMV employees and you will get the equivalent of medical care. These docs will make the same pay if they are specialists or drop outs. No incentive to be better than the next guy. That is what you will get. No thanks, Healthcare is not a right. Never has been. You get what you pay for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top