Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Fauci should have been fired after he released this new estimate. That makes this no more than a bad flu season.
We have vaccines available during a bad flu season. The vaccines aren`t always effective but we have none for Covid-19. Did Dr. Trump see the second wave coming?
Because of the extraordinary actions we are taking, yes, it may be just a bad flu season.
Do you get why we had to do this now?
My views on Covid-19 and the differences between this and a bad flu season are extremely serious. I think that in many areas, and all areas with a high population density, most of the population has been exposed. They fall into three categories: a) Exposed, never had symptoms and immune; b) Exposed, minor to moderate symptoms, then immune; ad c) Become seriously ill or die (but immune if they survive illness). I think most if not al of this "distancing," including use of masks, is theater designed to make people feel safe.
Analogous is a DM a poster to me, out of concern for my health, at the start of all this. She expressed worry about my proximity to New Rochelle, New York. If you remember that was the initial local hot spot before it hit NYC. I told her, truthfully, that I had spent lots of time there but wasn't even slightly worried. Similarly my wife did some work as an administrative assistant in a home where one of the children had attended a religious "day school" in New Roochelle, one of the first shut down for the virus.
My views are extremely serious and recent studies in Germany are bearing me out.
the climate change models are accurate, the mortality of the virus models are based on the best information at the time and human behavior.
So if the prediction was 100,000 or 200,000 would we have done anything different, the answer is no. You can see the impact in our healthcare system putting it on the brink.
CDC revises its 6%, down to 5%, of people actually dying "from" Kung Flu 1984, in the total number reported lamestream media. Making the total under 10,000 people dying "from" Kung Flu 1984
CDC revises its 6%, down to 5%, of people actually dying "from" Kung Flu 1984, in the total number reported lamestream media. Making the total under 10,000 people dying "from" Kung Flu 1984
3.28 million is a hell of a lot more than 10,000, and it ain't over yet.
You didn't answer the question. 4 is more than 1. Did you know that? Math is hard.
I realize there are groups who love counting the deaths, and are hoping for many, many, many more.
It's like they want to be proven RIGHT in their doomsday-death cult fanaticism so badly they are WISHING for millions of people to die.
Pretty sick.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
