Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-19-2020, 03:50 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchlights View Post
To the left, that number is 0.

Then again, the virus is just a front for a much larger sinister agenda.


RW hero Rush Limbaugh says it's only the common cold weaponized by Democrats. Righties oughta make up their minds what delusion they're selling.

 
Old 04-19-2020, 03:53 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
So?

Where does that leave you?

Whining about Trump.

As usual.

See, I can freely admit that I don't give a crap about Trump.

I don't hold any illusions that he gives a crap about me either.


I don't agree with everything he says or does......

But I agree with his policies a lot more than I agree with people like Chuck and Nancy.


And despite your incessant pablum.....a lot of people agree with him too.


And that's why he'll be re elected.

And you'll still be here, crying about it
Actually I'm having a jolly good time pointing out that your "Dear Leader" has no clothes.
 
Old 04-19-2020, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,089,783 times
Reputation: 11701
Quote:
Originally Posted by r small View Post
Actually I'm having a jolly good time pointing out that your "Dear Leader" has no clothes.


CLUE:.



Nobody cares.
 
Old 04-19-2020, 04:10 PM
 
Location: alexandria, VA
16,352 posts, read 8,095,474 times
Reputation: 9726
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
CLUE:.



Nobody cares.
Except you. Otherwise you wouldn't respond to my posts.
 
Old 04-19-2020, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,629 posts, read 9,454,674 times
Reputation: 22963
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchlights View Post
To the left, that number is 0.

Then again, the virus is just a front for a much larger sinister agenda.
Yup, liberals are exploiting this for a “practice socialism” trial. Proposing $2K a month for 6 months? And who is paying for it?
 
Old 04-19-2020, 04:26 PM
 
8,146 posts, read 3,676,088 times
Reputation: 2718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
Yup, liberals are exploiting this for a “practice socialism” trial. Proposing $2K a month for 6 months? And who is paying for it?
Who is paying for the no-strings attached socialistic corporate pork?
 
Old 04-19-2020, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,889,092 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
The OP did pose the question in a very cold manner, but despite being likely to lose someone to covid, I also fear an economic Depression, too, and would remind folks millions died of malnutrition during the Great Depression.

I like the NY approach, as its the epicenter. Like WH idea, which is similar.

14 straight days dropping indices being the trigger to start a very gradual, phased in reopening.Then, 100% occupancy goes bye bye until 2021, if I had my way. Be happy to be allowed 50% in 2020.

Recent surveys indicate 1 in 4 small business are either about to, or contemplating permanent closures. My opinion is, in hospitality, 1/2 never reopen. I expect millions of the newly unemployed to be uninsured for years. That leads to less medical care, and death also.

I want us to be careful, with both the virus medical and economic implications. Cool heads are required when its hardest to be cool.

If I truly thought the economic implications were short in duration, that would be one thing. Having been in business decades, I fear the D word economically. I pray our leaders balance virus and economy well, and empathize how hard that is, when we are dealing with so many unknowns.

The mortality rate in the Great Depression for Americans was lower than the mortality rate preceding it.
 
Old 04-19-2020, 05:36 PM
 
7,420 posts, read 2,709,177 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
It's 75,000 (additional). How so, you ask?

1) First, you've got to account for the fact that even if we maintain house arrest for the next two months, we will continue to see people die. Since we're beginning the downward part of the curve (nationwide), let's say 20,000. That is the FLOOR.

2) Then, we as a society have ALREADY decided that 45,000 deaths a year in car crashes is a price we are willing to pay to allow people to drive cars, given how they have become so embedded in ability to function - getting to work, to stores, just living one's life, etc. So, that's another 45,000. (If we had determined that 45,000 lives was a price too high to pay, then car ownership and use would be felonies, punishable by prison. We don't do that.)

3) Finally, we get to the TRUE costs in additional deaths (beyond what we have as a society already determined is acceptable), and I'd say 10,000 - the majority of whom are elderly and have already completed 95% of their lives. That is what we truly would be paying in "additional lives lost" in order to keep from falling into a Great Depression with 30% unemployed, and the increase in disease, crime, and suicide that comes from desperation of poverty and isolation.

Total: 75,000.
Got it, Rachel. The "death panels" the Republicans feverishly warned Americans about in 2009-2010, during their infamous ObamaCare hysteria, have finally materialized.

Last edited by corpgypsy; 04-19-2020 at 05:45 PM..
 
Old 04-19-2020, 05:44 PM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,502,232 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpgypsy View Post
Got it Rachael. The "death panels" the Republicans hysterically warned Americans about in 2009-2010 have finally materialized.
First, I never said there were death panels. (But I take it you are a Democrat and thus that is why you made a criticism of Republicans.) But do you disagree with the idea that we WILL have to accept some deaths - just as we do with the flu every year and just as we do with car accidents - rather than keep everyone shackled to their homes, and collapse the country in the process? You’re not one of these liberals who want to see the deaths go to zero, even if it takes a year and brings on the Great Depression, before we let people back to work, I hope.
 
Old 04-19-2020, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma
17,795 posts, read 13,692,692 times
Reputation: 17823
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
The mortality rate in the Great Depression for Americans was lower than the mortality rate preceding it.
The "starvation myth" of the great depression is long lived among right wingers. Sure, some people did, but nowhere near the "7 million" that is being bandied about on here.

One of the main reasons why is because of the relief programs that were implemented by the Roosevelt administration implemented. Of course right wingers will say that those programs weren't necessary or did more harm than good.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top