Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-25-2020, 03:44 PM
 
22,473 posts, read 12,003,345 times
Reputation: 20398

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
Hindsight? If they would have been around and the potus paid attention,, maybe less burials?? Tell me it can't be so?-- in fact tell the families of those buried, especially the ones that buried the nurses and doctors and children.
As for "hindsight" how can you say with any certainty that there somehow would have been "less burials" given the nature of this virus? Do tell, armchair quarterback.

Your post makes no sense at all. SMH
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2020, 03:49 PM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Who said they had no clue? Absolutely none? We’ve had them every couple years now. Other nations had different reactions because they learned from previous cases.



Yes, they knew that we would have another one, but tell us, for the next one that will happen, what do we need to stock up on this very moment, for the "next one." Be specific.....if you cannot, then well....


I'll even go 1 further.....we have CV19 under control (2022) and now it's 2029.....nothing has happened since then, you, as president, know another pandemic is going to happen, what do you stock up on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 03:51 PM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,177,347 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
I'm not lying. A team still exists --- one that had the fat trimmed from it. No excuses.

If anyone is "trying desperately to tell" something, it is you. Did you google and find that WaPo article? Were you able to read it without hitting the paywall?

"Years to prepare"? Stop trying to pass the buck. Why was nothing done in the previous administration?

At very least the previous administration should have stockpiled PPEs.
The article you post stated that the team was largely disbanded. Now you want to argue the opposite. Let it go.
There is no buck to pass. The Obama administration handled its crisis. The Trump administration has been here for years. If stockpiling PPEs was important to this administration, it would have done so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 03:52 PM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,177,347 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Yes, they knew that we would have another one, but tell us, for the next one that will happen, what do we need to stock up on this very moment, for the "next one." Be specific.....if you cannot, then well....
Whether you like it or not, this administration did not take the coronavirus seriously until it was too late.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 04:00 PM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Whether you like it or not, this administration did not take the coronavirus seriously until it was too late.
Thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee goes that goal post......


Answer my question, or just move along. You'd argue with anyone who approves of trump, no matter what.


So, again, I ask you:


Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
Yes, they knew that we would have another one, but tell us, for the next one that will happen, what do we need to stock up on this very moment, for the "next one." Be specific.....if you cannot, then well....
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 04:05 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,065,647 times
Reputation: 3884
He did not. Yet another D.C. urban legend. Call it a misrepresentation or outright lie, Reuters in their fact check tread the middle ground.

This appeared in The Washington Post, March 17, 2020. The author, the former head of the National Security Council, Directorate of counterproliferation and biodefense, unequivocally says that reorganization efforts are being misrepresented as a dismantling.

Quote:
As The Post reported in 2015, from the Clinton administration to the Obama administration’s second term, the NSC’s staff “had quadrupled in size, to nearly 400 people.” That is why Trump began streamlining the NSC staff in 2017.

One such move at the NSC was to create the counterproliferation and biodefense directorate, which was the result of consolidating three directorates into one, given the obvious overlap between arms control and nonproliferation, weapons of mass destruction terrorism, and global health and biodefense. It is this reorganization that critics have misconstrued or intentionally misrepresented.
https://www.hudson.org/research/1582...ce-i-was-there

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
Number one, I would not have dismantled the pandemic team set up by the previous administration. That made absolutely no sense. And you’re right, how each world leader handles this crisis will be part of the legacy that they leave. Some will leave better legacies than others...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,239,172 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReineDeCoeur View Post
The article you post stated that the team was largely disbanded. Now you want to argue the opposite. Let it go.
There is no buck to pass. The Obama administration handled its crisis. The Trump administration has been here for years. If stockpiling PPEs was important to this administration, it would have done so.
Trump never stops lying about how he found there was no "ammo" when he took over and how he got right on it and fixed it. That ammo isn't saving anyone right now and likely never will. Pandemic preparation was more important and Trump blew it. Bigly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
558 posts, read 299,632 times
Reputation: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
biden is a horrible candidate, and there is no momentum or enthusiasm at all on his side. You were just lucky enough to have this disaster interrupt a highly successful presidency.
lmao
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 04:20 PM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Trump never stops lying about how he found there was no "ammo" when he took over and how he got right on it and fixed it. That ammo isn't saving anyone right now and likely never will. Pandemic preparation was more important and Trump blew it. Bigly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
Yes, they knew that we would have another one, but tell us, for the next one that will happen, what do we need to stock up on this very moment, for the "next one." Be specific.....if you cannot, then well....

Maybe you can answer, but your anti-trump friends cannot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2020, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
558 posts, read 299,632 times
Reputation: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Maybe you can answer, but your anti-trump friends cannot.
Doesn't matter. Your guy is toast in November. And he knows it.

Pandemic + Economic collapse = Lost election

Move on, dude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top