Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:01 AM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,266,927 times
Reputation: 11907

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrose View Post
The Republicans are wimps. Where is Mitch McConnell??!,
They just sit back and let the liberals run the courts, the media, our education system, social media, and countless taxpayer hoax investigations and subpoenas.
Have the Rs served even ONE subpoena in the last decade????M
Bohner allowed a Subpoena against Eric Holder.
Paul Ryan refused to allow any Subpoenas when he was Speaker.
I don't know of McConnell issuing any, but I've not researched it.

It's not that they are "wimps" - it's that they are Estabishment Elite UniParty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:06 AM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,379,585 times
Reputation: 10251
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Eric “I’m Obama’s wingman” Holder will likely be going first
interesting description. Obama certainly picked Holder as his wingman. that's a fact.


what is even more important to know about Holder is that back in the Clinton days, the man worked really hard to get terrorists who killed people pardons.....




and Obama, knowing the immoral and evil of the man picked him for a wingman.




other than George Soros there isn't a more evil person in America than Holder... and his wingman...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,269 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
It's not as rare and most people think (or in this case - wish)

WHY DO INNOCENT
PEOPLE PLEAD GUILTY TO CRIMES THEY DIDN’T COMMIT? guilty plea problem. org

95% of felony convictions in the U.S. are obtained through guilty pleas

18% of known exonerees pleaded guilty to crimes they didn’t commit

65% of 418 exonerees who pleaded guilty were people of color

83% of DNA exoneration plea cases resulted in identification of the alternate perpetrator
Flynn was a millionaire, he didn't have a problem posting bond or acquiring good representation which is the case for many who are poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,269 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post

Flynn's original defense?? You mean Eric Holder's Law firm, Covington - I still can't figure out why he went with a slime ball like Holder for a defense. He almost deserves prison for stupidity.

I can't wait to see how Sullivan's latest stunt goes - it's going to be fun to watch.

He went through a few lawyers, when it comes to crime many from both sides choose the best law firms regardless of affiliation.


The only stunt was the one by Barr but I will let someone with a legal background weigh in on the friend of the court brief. It will be interesting to see what happens to Flynn's other indictments which they dropped because of his plea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:16 AM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,379,585 times
Reputation: 10251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Flynn was a millionaire, he didn't have a problem posting bond or acquiring good representation which is the case for many who are poor.


Flynn was a MILLIONAIR!!!!




Flynn was a career public servant who had a retirement plan. not exactly a super rich business class guy.


NOW Flynn is broke because Obama and his scumteam broke him.


What is clear is there was zero reason for the FBI to do the interview where they decided he lied....AFTER they decided he didn't lie.


No underlying crime. No predicate for investigation. Just a chance to hang a guy that Obama wanted hung.


In the end, his high paid lawyers got him screwed. then he got a lawyer who did the real work for nothing.


what makes me sad is you are defending this action by the political players who went after a guy with no underlying criminal act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:23 AM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,266,927 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
We are in very new territory with this case with the DOJ dropping a case after a conviction. The main purpose of the friends of the court briefings aren't for people to speak favorably of Flynn, its to invite arguments over the DOJ dropping the case.


Normally the DOJ drops a case when new information is brought to light instead all we have is Barr just inventing a legal argument to drop the case for which they already had a conviction. You can bet that prior prosecutors are going provide plenty and Flynn's lawyers will just provide the same tired defense.


This sure seems like a distraction by Trump to deflect from his handling of the pandemic, all this for a few months when he is going to pardon Flynn anyway. He could have been out of jail last year and back in business taking money from Russia and Turkey or working for Giuliani.


Flynn's team worried that the judge is creating legal arguments, that's hysterical.



https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/u...rge-judge.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Now you're all over the place, lets stick to Barr's legal argument for dropping the case which includes none of the issues you just created rather than an emotional response.
AG Barr dropped the case on Flynn AFTER Jeffrey B. Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri who was brought in by Attorney General William Barr to review the Flynn prosecution in February recommended it.

It was on Jensen's recommendation that Barr authorized federal attorneys in Washington last week to move to dismiss the charges against Flynn.

The reason AG Barr assigned Jensen to review the case was because of the variety of FOIA cases brought by different individuals revealed more evidence. Jensen has now been assigned (with 4 more US Attorneys) to work with Durham.

You have to admit - it's pretty "hysterical" for Sullivan to request these Amicus briefs when the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously just last week that to do that is clearly Un-Constitutional.
I'm laughing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:42 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,084,700 times
Reputation: 7852
What the hech is this about?


https://twitter.com/Edwardstwts/stat...10399566802947
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 10:46 AM
 
18,563 posts, read 7,370,877 times
Reputation: 11375
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Trump is the most incompetent and unqualified POTUS we’ve ever had. So obviously he can’t do detailed policy work himself.

Trumpists are suffering from a severe case of misplaced trust.
There's no trust. Just knowledge that Trump is infinitely better than the alternative. Why can't you grasp that? Your side is evil. There's no level of "incompetence" that could make Trump less appealing than the alternative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 11:00 AM
 
18,563 posts, read 7,370,877 times
Reputation: 11375
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
We aren't dealing with normal !!! We are dealing with "Obamagate" and the persecution of Gen. Flynn is one element of that !!! There was nothing normal about this from the beginning !!!
Its not normal for the outgoing admin. to spy and persecute the incoming admin. !!! This should never happen !!! There has to be accountability or what should never happen will happen again !!! Nothing to deter this kind of despicable behavior in the future !!!
Interestingly, the precedent people keep talking about is the case of Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska. Robert Mueller announced that Stevens had committed a crime right before the election, and because of Mueller's election interference Stevens's opponent won. (Ultimately, this may have made the difference in the passage of Obamacare.) Mueller railroaded Stevens and convicted him a week before election day in 2008. Then when the Obama administration took over a few months later, Eric Holder dismissed the case despite the conviction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,269 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15638
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
AG Barr dropped the case on Flynn AFTER Jeffrey B. Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri who was brought in by Attorney General William Barr to review the Flynn prosecution in February recommended it.

It was on Jensen's recommendation that Barr authorized federal attorneys in Washington last week to move to dismiss the charges against Flynn.

The reason AG Barr assigned Jensen to review the case was because of the variety of FOIA cases brought by different individuals revealed more evidence. Jensen has now been assigned (with 4 more US Attorneys) to work with Durham.

You have to admit - it's pretty "hysterical" for Sullivan to request these Amicus briefs when the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously just last week that to do that is clearly Un-Constitutional.
I'm laughing.
I see no indication that Jensen found new information or providing a recommendation nor did he sign off on dropping the case against Flynn. Amicus briefs are unconstitutional in a case that was dropped by the DOJ after a conviction, clearly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top