Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How about all the Blacks killed by other Blacks in cities EVERY DAY? Don't they count? Also, when a white person gets killed by a black person, why no big media outrage? Why the constant attempt by the Media and their minions to make Whites seem Racist all the time?
When Blacks kill other Blacks, they get arrested. Something that didn't happen here until now.
We had one thread on this fake outrage story already. The “jogger” was a mentally I’ll criminal who, clear as day, is seen running towards the guy, punching him in the head, and trying to grab his gun before the bullet makes contact with him. He then runs away a few steps. Sad but only in a SJW and ultra-race charged climate would they be charged with the guy’s death. Sad but here we are.
Right. And if two armed black men chased down a white 'suspect' and shot him dead, there would be just as much coverage even if they were arrested.
I don't care about coverage, give me justice instead. The outrage is that the rednecks didn't get arrested for their crimes, presumably because they were white. If they happened to be black, they would have already been sitting in a dark jail cell for months.
If charges are warranted, they will be brought. Facts and law must drive this case. Not racism and emotions. If the father and son are liable under the law, then charge and hail them. I won't jump ahead of things.
Why does everyone keep talking about the father. What exactly can he be charged with beyond maybe a false attempted imprisonment? I don't even think the son is facing any serious time. They took the law into their own hands and it ended very badly. The worst charge that can be leveled will be involuntary manslaughter.
Innocent man dead and those 2 other men are DONE, going away for a very long time, if not life.
Innocent?
He had prior criminal convictions, one of them a gun conviction, and he was suspected of burglarizing a residence in that neighborhood. Apparently there is video of him commiting a burglary that hasn't been released to the public yet.
Also, the defence is going to make a strong case for the two men acting in self-defense. They're going to claim that Arbery ran toward the man holding the shotgun, tried to grab the shotgun away from him, thus giving the man the only option to shoot in self-defense.
The jury will have to decide what to believe.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
