Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The evidence is in the respective research articles, genius. Look it up yourself, Mr. Projectionist.
Still waiting on your evidence that it originated in a lab....any day now, Mr. Projectionist.
Already told you I have read it - I know their claims. I'm seeing if you do! It is obvious that you don't.
Again, I do not claim that there is evidence for a lab origin. Care to point out where I did - or is this another misrepresentation by you? I'm challenging your claims about the evidence these papers are presenting - they are no that clear and certainly not proof nor do they rule out a lab possibility at this time.
Lol, really. Is creating new laws for labs because of the incident involving the Wuhan Market a distraction too?
"On February 14, President Xi Jinping gave a speech to party leaders declaring China must "close the loopholes exposed by the epidemic". He announced the fast-tracking of a new law for "biosecurity at laboratories" specifically targeting the use of biological agents that "may harm national security". The law had been in the pipeline for some months and some experts say tightening security measures at laboratories is to be expected after an outbreak like this one."
I mean - if there is no lab leak - what loopholes is President Xi Jinping closing exactly?
Correlation isn’t causation.
Nor does the January paper in the New England Journal of Medicine claim that the virus was of lab origin.
Nor does the January paper in the New England Journal of Medicine claim that the virus was of lab origin.
Well, as the labs defense attorney, I hope China is paying you well for the subterfuge. It amazes me that China and its scientists are seeming to be more open and honest than you are. Why is that?
I think there is a possibility it was a lab leak just based on the CCP's reputation and past atrocious human rights abuses and outstanding public health and safety failures,
Professor Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Prize winner for Medicine, claims that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.
Already told you I have read it - I know their claims. I'm seeing if you do! It is obvious that you don't.
Again, I do not claim that there is evidence for a lab origin. Care to point out where I did - or is this another misrepresentation by you? I'm challenging your claims about the evidence these papers are presenting - they are no that clear and certainly not proof nor do they rule out a lab possibility at this time.
What’s “obvious“ is that you already have a conclusion in mind yet can’t provide one iota of supporting evidence.
I don't think anyone is suggesting the virus originally came from a lab, they're merely suggesting that the virus was possibly altered in a lab to make it more lethal, e.g. altering the RNA to increase gain of function so it infects more hosts and is more lethal.
This type of research may have been going on at the Wuhan virology lab, which was located just a few hundred yards from the wet market in Wuhan where some of the first cases were traced back to.
05-08-2020, 09:15 PM
2K5Gx2km
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by subaru5555
What’s “obvious“ is that you already have a conclusion in mind yet can’t provide one iota of supporting evidence.
The only conclusion I have is that the so-called evidence for proof is not proof nor does it rule out a lab origin. But I'll just start to present why instead of wasting more time on Goose Steppers....
I don't think anyone is suggesting the virus originally came from a lab, they're merely suggesting that the virus was possibly altered in a lab to make it more lethal, e.g. altering the RNA to increase gain of function so it infects more hosts and is more lethal.
This type of research may have been going on at the Wuhan virology lab, which was located just a few hundred yards from the wet market in Wuhan where some of the first cases were traced back to.
Would anyone care to speculate on why the lab would want to do that? Pest control maybe?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
