Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please note that half of the idiots trying to discredit her by calling her names, (notice zero proof of anything, just name calling), didn't even watch her video. Openly admitted that they didn't watch it, but want to pretend that their wikipedia research taught them all that they needed to know about her, if they did any research at all - which most did not.
In other words, you get your "facts" from youtube conspiracy videos, unlike all of the idiots who know how to read and think critically and don't waste their time watching youtube videos created by nutjobs looking to make some money off of the easily influenced.
I simply don't understand this latest obsession to denigrate a viral specialist of some 50 years, all because he disagreed with God Trump during pressers.
I simply don't understand this latest obsession to denigrate a viral specialist of some 50 years, all because he disagreed with God Trump during pressers.
For that is all it is.
Because the tone of the country set forth by the most prominent leaders is one to discredit all those that don't fall in line with political agendas despite expertise, research, science, and years of service.
This ignorance leads people to believe some lunatic with a failed career over one that still remains a respected individual that has served several administrations from both parties.
Off topic slightly, but this is decent place to ask:
Is there word for the condition where you are inclined to believe all conspiracy and doubt all official stories?
I'm serious - I see alot of it here - it's some kind of psychosis -gotta be - is there a name for it? Not kidding...wish I were...
It's the same where you believe all official stories and doubt all conspiracy. It's called lack of critical thinking.
Examine the facts, only then do you know if it's true.
And by facts? I mean facts. Not SOMEONE ELSE'S OPINION. Which is pretty much what happens here. Instead of discussing facts, what get discussed is "so-and-so said this and that. So I believe so-and-so." Followed by a google-copy-paste marathon.
Rather than, I looked this circumstance up and found 4 different sources that said 2 different things. So I looked up the 2 different things to get more background. Then I looked at another source. Now I can make an educated guess as to what happened...
instead of "did you see this twitter post??? OMG that is SO TRUE!!!"
Exclusive: Duncy Doc disputes Fauci's Facts.
You all know she is a poor excuse for a scientist or researcher, right? Desperate for her fifteen minutes of fame. She is selling her worthless book.
Tell us in your own words specifically why Dr Mikovits is a "poor excuse" for a scientist or researcher.
Be specific, as to EXACT faults with her research, citing specific papers and why they are rife with errors.
Oh, no need link to the info, since you've spent a lot of hours studying her. You've read her work, understand it and can comment intelligently on why she is a "poor excuse" for a scientist and researcher right?
Look forward to your detailed and well-reasoned response.
Just a highly disgruntled, bitter and foolish former federal employee now hoping to make millions with her new book. I'm not buying it.
Prove it. You don't know her or fauci, right?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.