Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2020, 02:02 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,230,680 times
Reputation: 9845

Advertisements

The Republicans doing what they do best - pissing on the Constitution.


Georgia Republicans cancel election for state Supreme Court, so governor can appoint a Republican

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2020, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,410,626 times
Reputation: 8966
Georgia is slipping away from GOP control fast and they are taking every procedural avenue possible to stem the losses. It will only delay the inevitable though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 02:10 PM
 
1,553 posts, read 925,004 times
Reputation: 1659
Ah, the party of CORRUPTION strikes again...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 02:11 PM
 
45,579 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23888
Sounds like they are learning from the left.

From the article...

Shortly after receiving this letter, Kemp formally accepted Blackwell’s future resignation. The governor then informed Raffensperger, the state’s chief elections officer, that he intended to fill Blackwell’s seat by gubernatorial appointment. In response, Raffensperger canceled the election to fill Blackwell’s seat, which was scheduled for May 19.

Both Democratic candidate Barrow and Republican candidate Beskin filed lawsuits seeking to reinstate the election, but these pleas were rejected by the state Supreme Court in a 6-2 vote.

The court’s decision in Barrow turns on the tension between two provisions of the Georgia Constitution. The first provides that “all Justices of the Supreme Court and the Judges of the Court of Appeals shall be elected on a nonpartisan basis for a term of six years,” and that the terms of these judges “shall begin the next January 1 after their election.” Because this language refers to “all Justices,” it suggests that an election must be held to fill Blackwell’s seat, and that whoever prevails in that election shall join the state Supreme Court on the first of January.

But a separate provision of the state constitution permits the governor to temporarily fill vacancies on the state Supreme Court, and it provides that “an appointee to an elective office shall serve until a successor is duly selected and qualified and until January 1 of the year following the next general election which is more than six months after such person’s appointment.”

Thus, while the first provision suggests that an election must be held to fill Blackwell’s seat — with the winner taking office on January 1, 2021 — the second provision indicates that an appointed justice may serve much longer. When Blackwell resigns on November 18, the “next general election which is more than six months” after that date won’t occur until 2022.

So the second provision seems to suggest that an appointed justice may serve until January 1, 2023 — and longer, if that justice eventually wins the 2022 election. The new justice will also be able to run with all the advantages incumbency provides.


Doesn't sound like any laws were broken here. Looks like a loophole for these instances to occur. My guess is that liberals created the loophole (because that's what they do) and Kemp found it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,868 posts, read 26,498,769 times
Reputation: 25768
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
The Republicans doing what they do best - pissing on the Constitution.


Georgia Republicans cancel election for state Supreme Court, so governor can appoint a Republican

.
So after complaining about how serious this pandemic is, you're now upset that elected officials are doing something about it? Do you want people to put their lives at risk just so you can vote?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 08:39 PM
 
45,579 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
So after complaining about how serious this pandemic is, you're now upset that elected officials are doing something about it? Do you want people to put their lives at risk just so you can vote?
I think that after I pulled from the OP's article explaining why nothing was stolen, things seem to have gotten quiet.

You know how it goes... sensational thread title based only on the headline - expecting that no one will actually read the content. Dig down and find out it's about nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2020, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,750 posts, read 22,654,259 times
Reputation: 24907
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Sounds like they are learning from the left.

From the article...

Shortly after receiving this letter, Kemp formally accepted Blackwell’s future resignation. The governor then informed Raffensperger, the state’s chief elections officer, that he intended to fill Blackwell’s seat by gubernatorial appointment. In response, Raffensperger canceled the election to fill Blackwell’s seat, which was scheduled for May 19.

Both Democratic candidate Barrow and Republican candidate Beskin filed lawsuits seeking to reinstate the election, but these pleas were rejected by the state Supreme Court in a 6-2 vote.

The court’s decision in Barrow turns on the tension between two provisions of the Georgia Constitution. The first provides that “all Justices of the Supreme Court and the Judges of the Court of Appeals shall be elected on a nonpartisan basis for a term of six years,” and that the terms of these judges “shall begin the next January 1 after their election.” Because this language refers to “all Justices,” it suggests that an election must be held to fill Blackwell’s seat, and that whoever prevails in that election shall join the state Supreme Court on the first of January.

But a separate provision of the state constitution permits the governor to temporarily fill vacancies on the state Supreme Court, and it provides that “an appointee to an elective office shall serve until a successor is duly selected and qualified and until January 1 of the year following the next general election which is more than six months after such person’s appointment.”

Thus, while the first provision suggests that an election must be held to fill Blackwell’s seat — with the winner taking office on January 1, 2021 — the second provision indicates that an appointed justice may serve much longer. When Blackwell resigns on November 18, the “next general election which is more than six months” after that date won’t occur until 2022.

So the second provision seems to suggest that an appointed justice may serve until January 1, 2023 — and longer, if that justice eventually wins the 2022 election. The new justice will also be able to run with all the advantages incumbency provides.


Doesn't sound like any laws were broken here. Looks like a loophole for these instances to occur. My guess is that liberals created the loophole (because that's what they do) and Kemp found it.
Doubt it. Republicans have been in control for quite some time, Hmm?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2020, 03:50 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,504,883 times
Reputation: 13259
From the OP’s article:

”The court’s decision in Barrow turns upon poorly drafted language in the state constitution, which does suggest that Blackwell, Kemp, and Raffensperger’s scheme was legal.

Vox spent a lot of time inferring that a crime took place, only to be factual in a tiny paragraph of the story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2020, 04:51 AM
 
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
5,067 posts, read 1,665,707 times
Reputation: 3144
something like this needs to happen in Hank Johnsons district to get that embarrassment out of Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2020, 05:10 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,625,222 times
Reputation: 12560
Without lying and cheating the Republicans would have a difficult time winning any election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top