Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Science often has members who propose alternatives to the general consensus. (An example of this is Halton Arp, who went searching for galactic interactions that could disprove the Big Bang theory.) These individuals are useful for finding cracks in a consensus model. But proving a negative is often difficult. Demonstrating the lab-origin hypothesis will require a careful search for a natural progenitor and host animal, which could take many years, assuming China will even cooperate. Until then, it remains an open question and I expect the consensus will stay in place.
The team led by Nikolai Petrovsky, Professor of Medicine at Flinders University, has suggested that SARS-CoV-2 was likely genetically engineered that led the virus naturally evolving in an animal subject to be effective at attaching to human cells.
Well, that's certainly definitive IF it's saying what you want to hear, eh?
They are essentially uncontrollable as it is at this point, and they already answer to no one. Any observance of decisions and regulations on their part at present is utterly voluntary. The world allowed the fox to guard the hen house and the results were predictable.
^^^^This reminds of the story about the woman who found a dying, injured snake and nursed it back to health. Once the snake recovered, it bit the woman. As the woman was dying she asked the snake why it bit her when she was the one who nursed it back to health. The snake said to her "You knew I was a snake when you took me in."
We knew China was a "snake" when we took it in. If we had any doubts it was a snake, what happened in Tianamen Square should have erased any doubts. Yet Old Man Bush still renewed China's most favored nation status. Now the snake has bitten not only us but the entire world.
Now the question is this --- Are we going to finally see "the snake" for what it is and stop enabling it? Or are we going to allow the snake to keep biting us?
if it was man-made wouldnt they have made it more deadly? if it was man-made, it would have been made something along the lines of the Captain Tripss virus in the Stephen King's the Stand its already been studied with the RNA of the virus that it wasnt man-made
if it was man-made wouldnt they have made it more deadly? if it was man-made, it would have been made something along the lines of the Captain Tripss virus in the Stephen King's the Stand its already been studied with the RNA of the virus that it wasnt man-made
Really?
The Chicoms made a big deal about closing their wet markets. After all, they told the world that was where the virus originated. The closings didn't last long. The wet markets are now all open again.
That tells the world that the Chicoms know the virus didn't come from the wet market. It was created in the Wuhan lab. If it wasn't, why are they refusing to let other countries see the lab for themselves? Why are they refusing to tell the world how the virus spread so rapidly? Why are they refusing to tell anyone who patient zero is and what happened to them?
^^^^This reminds of the story about the woman who found a dying, injured snake and nursed it back to health. Once the snake recovered, it bit the woman. As the woman was dying she asked the snake why it bit her when she was the one who nursed it back to health. The snake said to her "You knew I was a snake when you took me in."
We knew China was a "snake" when we took it in. If we had any doubts it was a snake, what happened in Tianamen Square should have erased any doubts. Yet Old Man Bush still renewed China's most favored nation status. Now the snake has bitten not only us but the entire world.
Now the question is this --- Are we going to finally see "the snake" for what it is and stop enabling it? Or are we going to allow the snake to keep biting us?
At this point, putting the genie back in the bottle in any meaningful sense carries with it the risk of inducing WW3.
Like it or hate it the following is only my opinion:
Excerpt:
Dr Petrovsky said in a statement that the virus shows signs of being ‘cultured’ to evolve over time rather than being rapidly genetically spliced and mutated.
“These are generally easily recognisable and hence clear signatures of human intervention in the creation of a virus. The fact that these artificial inserts are not present has been interpreted by some to mean this virus is not the result of human manipulation,” said Petrovsky.
Response:
It is truly scary how far evil will go to erase its own footsteps so as not to be followed.
The CCP will be held accountable in the world court one day. The virus only exposed
the party for what they are.
You do realize the virus is not man made, according to your post?
So weren't we paying for the labs for studying and testing and other research? ohhh
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.