Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
His reasons are different. That protects a site like this one from being held liable from what users post. He wants to remove those protections. "Biden <insert some slander here>" would make the site owner liable. This would be impossible task for sites that have little resources and could make a site like C-D disappear. Sites like Twitter, Facebook and Youtube may have the resources to police it but they would be significantly different than they are today.
The argument being made by Republicans is they can't simultaneously hide behind these protections and be engaging in substantial editing of content because they have crossed the line into publisher.
Whatever the case those protections need to remain in place or the internet as you know it goes away. Sites like Twitter engaging in significant editing of content should have to give up that protection.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
